Beginner's Primer on
General 911 Studies
The Path of News Breaks
- A sampling of the rare exceptions that prove
the media's hear/see/report-no-9/11-evil rule
The Truth About Sept. 11
By Ted Rall, AlterNet, September 11, 2002
First 9/11 questions statement by a well known media figure (one
year late and only online, but still much appreciated)
Fallout: The Hidden Environmental Consequences of 9/11
by Juan Gonzalez, In These Times, September 10, 2002
Early prophetic piece on the administration cover-up of the
post-attack pollution (Implicit question: If they could condemn
thousands of New Yorkers to death just to get the Stock Exchange
running, how many would they sacrifice to run Afghanistan and
9/11 Pollution Could Cause More Deaths Than Attack
by Geoffrey Lean, The Independent (UK), September 12, 2004
A Sierra Club study confirms and grimly quantifies the previous
story, which breaks in a major world paper.
One Year Later: Unintended Consequences of 9/11 and the War on
by John Tirman, AlterNet, August 29, 2002
Early, almost touchingly naive, recount of 9/11's exploitation -
unintended by whom?
The Enemy Within
by Gore Vidal, The Observer (UK), October 27, 2002
In a 7,000 word essay and review of Ahmed's "War on Freedom",
Vidal lays out the early evidence for administration complicity
(This stunning piece has never been quoted or even mentioned in
the mainstream US press.)
Conspiracy Crusader Doubts Official 9/11 Version
by Michele Landsberg, Toronto Star, May 11, 2003
Celebrated columnist sympathetically introduces 9/11 truth pioneer
Barry Zwicker in Canada's largest paper.
Barbs aside, 9/11 questions aren't going away
by Michelle Landsberg, Toronto Star, May 18, 2003
And takes a lot of flack...
Four 9/11 Moms Battle Bush
by Gail Sheehy, New York Observer (front page story), August 25,
First "unanswered questions" story appears in the US press:
Best-selling author Sheehy offers this great human and political
saga to all New York's mainstream publications, but only one
feisty weekly had the guts to pick it up.
This War on Terrorism is Bogus
The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to
secure its global domination
by Michael Meacher, The Guardian/UK, September 6, 2003
First compelling sketch of the motive, means and opportunity for
the 9/11 crimes by veteran UK cabinet official.
Why Don't We Have Answers to These 9/11 Questions?
by William Bunch, Philadelphia Daily News, September 11, 2003
First mention of "unanswered questions" in major US daily, brave
and well done, but two years after the fact.
Conspiracy Theories about Sept. 11 Get Hearing in Germany
- Distrust of U.S. Fuels Stories about Source of the Attacks
By Ian Johnson, Wall Street Journal, September 29, 2003
orporate Journalism Central begins damage control, but still
relates some intriguing facts.
Whitewash as Public Service: How The 9/11 Commission Report
defrauds the nation
By Benjamin DeMott, Harper's Magazine, October 2004
Despite the feisty title, the piece generally collapses into
minutiae and fry-more-bureaucrats gripes. For a far deeper insight
into the Commission cover-up, see
David Ray Griffin's "A National Disgrace" - an intro to his
9/11 Commission Report - Omissions and Distortions."
The Path of Stubborn Questions
- Victim family queries that remain unanswered to this day
The Path of Deceit, Distortion & Perjury
- The Way of the Neocon Warrior (When the "free press"
turns to stenography, Machiavelli returns to life!)
The Path of Past Precedents
- How and why they keep doing it to us,
a crash course in official betrayal
The Path of Timelines
- Systematic compilations of documented 9/11 facts that make
"coincidence theory" the wildest hypothesis of the day