James Stenzel Presents... This Scholarly Library of Facts about Domestic & Worldwide Zionist Criminality The Jew Watch Project Is The Internet's Largest Scholarly Collection of Articles on Zionist History Free Educational Library for Private Study, Scholarship, Research & News About Zionism We Reveal Zionist Banksters, News Falsifiers, PR Liars, Neocons, Subversives, Terrorists, Spies & More The Jew Watch Project's 1.5 Billion Pages Served Demonstrate Our Focus on Professionalism An Oasis of News for Americans Who Presently Endure the Hateful Censorship of Zionist Occupation

Top: JewishOccupied Governments: United Kingdom: JewsWho Deal With UK Royalty

It has long been one of the Jewish methods in the attainmentof world domination to penetrate into privileged circles where politicalpower is greatest: Edward the First, by expelling the Jews in 1290, savedus from too early an application of this process in Britain, but the othercountries were less fortunate and suffered the extinction of their nobilityby Jewish women marrying into the Gentile aristocratic families.

In Britain a few "damped" (baptized Christian)Jews remained in the country when their synagogue-going brothers had beenexpelled.

Some of these attained knighthood, for instance, SirEdward Brampton , who became Governor of Guernsey. The first serious attempt,however, to penetrate the ranks of the hereditary Titleholders of Englandseems to have been an attack upon royalty itself by that notorious character,Perkin Warbeck, who was a servant of the knight mentioned above.

With characteristic Jewish effrontery, this man claimedthe English throne.

Francis Bacon wrote in his Life of King Henry the VII:"There was a townsman of Tourney that had born office in that town,whose name was John Osbeck, a convert Jew, married to Catherine de Faro;whose business drew him to live for a time with his wife at London, in KingEdward IV's days.

During which time he had a son by her; and being knownin court, the King either out of religious nobleness, because he was a convert,or upon some private acquaintance, did him the honor as to be godfatherto his child. and named him Peter.

But afterwards proving a dainty and effeminate youth,he was commonly called by the diminutive of his name. Peterkin or Perkin.For, as for the name of Warbeck, it was given him when they did but guessat it, before examinations had been taken.

For how many of us at school realized that Perkin Warbeckwas a figure in the Jewish world plot against us, Sovereignty?

As everyone knows, Cromwell allowed the Jews to returnand they flocked over here toward the latter part of the seventeenth century,the largest wave of rich Jews coming over with William III from Holland.

In 1718 the Attorney General, Sir R. Raymond, hammeredanother nail into his country's coffin. By deciding that Jews could holdland in England. Walpole had previously allowed the Jew Gideon to hold estatesby a special act in his favor: this Jew had lent his "credit"to the government (!) which seems not to have realized that it had a lotof its own.

And falsely posing as a Christian, for he never ceasedhis payments to the synagogue and died a Jew, he married a Gentile, hisson being created a baronet and later Baron, Eardley, a title now fortunatelyextinct. The first synagogue Jew baronets were Sir I.L.

Goldsmid (1841), Sir Moses Monteflore, and Sir Anthonyde Rothschild; these seem to have qualified for British aristocracy by usingtheir ill-gotten wealth in buying privileges for the Jews in this and othercountries.

It was Sir Issac . Goldsmid who led movement for theadmission of he Jews to our legislature. Once the barrier was down the restwas easy.

In 1858 legislation enabled the foreign "baron"Lionel de Rothschild to take his oath in the house of Commons as a Jew.His son was raised to the peerage in 1885, the "damped" Jews Disraelihad of course obtained earlier honors, dying as the Earl of Beaconsfield.Among the earlier Synagogue baronet creations were those of Sir George Jessel,Sir David Salomans, and Sir John Simon (no relation to the living Sir JohnSimon, who claims not to be Jewish).

British peers sometimes made matters worse by marryingJewesses, one of the most disastrous cases being that of the second ViscountGalway, who married as early as 1747 a Jewess called Villa Real, as a resultof which countless fine old British families have had this Asiatic straininstilled into them.

It was a Rothschild plan to marry superfluous daughtersinto the families of influential Gentiles; in this case of the Rothschildunions with Baron Battersea and the son of the fourth Earl of Hardwicke,the marriages were sterile, but a daughter of Mayer Amschel Rothschild marriedthe fifth Earl of Rosebery, so that there is Rothschild blood in the presentearl, one of whose sisters married the present Marquis of Crewe, himselfwith Villa Real blood: thus after many days, the blood of the Villa realJewess mingles with that of the Rothschild in the issue of this marriageof "British Aristocrats".

This custom of mating with Jewesses now become a commonone; the instinct of the Aryan has been broken down by continued propaganda,and H. Belloc in his book on The Jews writes of the Jewish penetration ofour great aristocratic families: "With the opening of the twentiethcentury, those of the great territorial English families in which therewas no Jewish blood were the exception.

In nearly all of them the strain was more or less marked,in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English andthe tradition those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physiqueand character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family weretaken for Jews whenever thee traveled in countries where the gentry hadnot yet suffered or enjoyed this mixture."

A study of the "society " photographers inany copy of The Bystander will convince anyone that Mr. Belloc does notexaggerate.

To those of us who believe that Bretisation is civilizationit is incomprehensible that our aristocrats could succumb to the cunningMasonic and educational Jewish propaganda designed to cause them to forgettheir nation.

Nevertheless the opposition, to Jewish penetration intothe great families has not been expressed in any decided way: Masonry isno doubt responsible for this Queen Victoria herself had qualms about grantingtitles to Jews, because we know that when it was recommend to her that SirLionel Rothschild should be promoted the peerage, shewrote as follows in a letter dated November 1 1869 to Mr. Gladstone: "Itis not only the feeling of which she cannot divest herself, against makinga person of Jewish religion a peer, but she can not think that one who oweshis great wealth to contracts with foreign governments for loans or to successfulspeculation the stock exchange can fairly claim a Britishpeerage.

However high Sir L. Rothschild may stand personallyin public estimation, this seems to be not the less a species of gamblingbecause it is on a gigantic scale and far removed from that legitimate tradingwhich she delights to honor. in which men have raised themselves by patientindustry and unswerving probity to positions of wealth and influence."

Her sound instincts, or "prejudices" as theywould be called nowadays in our Judaized press, were however broken downby Disraeli and we have now reached such a pitch that in 1932 the Jews wereseriously planning to get the chief rabbi into the House of Lords, ex-officio.

In 1915 a daughter of the fourth Baron Sheffield marriedthe Jew Edwin Montague, the disturber of Indian "pathetic contentment,'and actually "embraced Judaism" also in religious sense. Therewas more excuse for Lord George Gordon of the 1780 anti-Popery campaign,who adopted the Jewish religion but died insane.

In the following review of our titled aristocracy, thereare many errors of omission; working chiefly with Burke's peerage, we finda reticence on the subject of Jewish "relativity" in our nobility;in other words, the volume seems designed to baffle the investigator asmuch as possible.

For that reason and also because the time at our disposalfor this research is strictly limited, the review is far from complete,but it is sufficiently terrible to a racist as it is.

Every effort has been made to avoid errors of commission;we do not desire to hurt the feelings of anyone, but the British peoplehave a right to know the truth; where ever we have insufficient evidencein suspicious cases, the benefit of the doubt has been given, we hope, inmany future editions, to be able to make our lists more complete.

The excellent library of he Society of Genealogistscould not produce a single volume which was of direct help in collectingthis material for this pamphlet, which we hope, therefore, will find a placeon its shelves; but we think something will prevent it getting there.

It may be of interest to mention that Debrett's Peerageis published by the same Jew firm Odhams Press, Ltd, which runs the DailyHerald.

Sir Sidney Lee (Jew) edited the Dictionary of NationalBiography, so we get little help from those. And the Jew, M. Epstein, editsthe Annual Register.

We have omitted from our list certain cases where Jewesseshave married into noble families in which there the titles are now extinctor from which marriages there was no issue.

In our investigations we fund that the statement madeby J. M. Macdiarmid in The Deer Forests that the Leveson-Gower family wasdescended from "a London Jew money lender" is false; the name"Levenson" in this case has no Jewish application.

Also the statement made in the Jewish Daily Post June17, 1935, that the present Duchess of Norfold has Jewish blood is untrue.she is the second wife of the last duke and mother of the present duke;and it was the first wife of the last duke, who left no heir, who had Jewishblood. The Universe is in error in stating (Feb. 4, 1937) that the Marquisof Bute is descended from the Jew Treves.

Many Jewish titles, sometimes camouflaged like thoseof Barons Wandsworth (Real name, Stern) and Pirbright (real name, De Worms),are fortunately extinct. Extinct, also is the baronetcy of Sir Edward Speyer,which was revoked by a notice in the Times of December 14, 1921 on accountof his unlawful communicating and trading with the enemy during the war.

The effect even a slight mixture of Jewish blood inan english family is often very great. It alters the political outlook ofthe individual because it alters the instincts themselves.

"One Jew ancestor a long way back will undo yourAnglo-Saxon composition, or which you may claim an unbroken line of purelyEssex stock, more thoroughly than if all your ancestors, from your parentsback had been Dutch, German, Swede, Dane, French, Russian, Portuguese, Italianpr any other easily assimilated race." W. Gerbardt in Memories of aPolyglot, 1931.

When a large number of individuals in commanding socialor political positions are rendered partly Asiatic in instinct, the nationitself becomes the victim of these destructive instincts.

Referring to Colonel Lane's book The Alien Menace, thenation itself becomes the victim of those destructive instincts.

"English men and women are constantly asking howit comes about that a twist is so frequently given to British policy thatis clearly not in accordance with British interests.

There is usually someone in a position , at the psychologicalmoment, to deflect our government, whatever party be in power, into someline of action that is unintelligible at the time and is fraught with disastrousconsequences. * * * It is as though some hostile influence were steadilythrowing grit into the machine.

In every international financial arrangement we farebadly, and the whole story of reparations and war debts is humiliating inthe extreme and calculated to make us the worlds laughing stock as wellas the worlds milk cow.

It is in this connection that such a book as ColonelLane has written **** throws a timely searchlight. It is in the higher ranksof society that the alien menace is formidable through the influence exercisedin government departments in Downing Street and high finance by gentry ofunmistakable foreign origin."

Hereditary Titleholders of Jewish Blood

(Editors Note. This book was written in 1937 and wasinserted in the Congressional Record in August 1940. Because of the rapidchange and inroads made into English Nobility in the intervening years onlythe total of each type of Jewish lineage will be listed. The more a lineagebecomes intermarried with Jews the faster it becomes totally Jewish. Atthis time almost 60 years after this book was written no doubt Jewish inroadshas been tremendously increased.)

2 Dukes

7 Marquis

7 Earls

17 Barons

1 Baroness

1 Dowager

53 Sirs

As though that were not enough, the following noblemenand Baronets now holding their titles have married women of Jewish blood;their heirs, if any by descent from these, will be Jewish aristocrats.

1 Duke

2 2 Marquis

3 Earls

3 Viscounts

10 Barons

22 Sirs

We are convinced that if we could get proof of certainfacts regarding the relationships of other titled families, we could morethan double the above list.

Here is a "mixed pickle" of Jewish relationshipswhich we print, not because these cases necessarily influence the titledpeople mentioned in every instance, as some of them may detest the connection,but to show how intimate the Jewish penetration has become (marriages orJewish connections, ed)

The author gives the names of the following and certainother details.

1 Duke

4 Marquis

10 Earls

11 Viscounts

10 Barons

In many of the above cases, the heir to the title isinvolved. Once more, we must emphasize how incomplete the above list stillis.

We do not know exactly how to classify Baron Strabolgi,formerly Commander Kenworthy, Socialist M.P. But the Daily telegraph ofApril 16, 1934 is less cautious and includes him is a list of what it describedas the "leaders of the British Jewry".

Lord Strabolgi looks Jewish, boosts the Jewish nationat every opportunity and reacts like a Jew, and once was director of theEuropean & Caucasian Export & Import Co. Which as the Patriot states,May 23, 1929 had a capital of L2,200 and "could be nothing but an intermediarybetween the Soviet that found the banking security and the manufacturerswho sold the goods."

10 Sirs

Lord Marley is another baron who appears to be a littleshy as to his ancestry; Burke peerage) simply reveals him to be the grandsonof George Joachim Aman. but Lord Marley's actions show that, what ever hemay be. he cannot regard libelous to be descried at least as an "artificialJew"' he spends much of his time boosting Jews and Jew interests.

There are scores of other "lords " who arefar too shy to reveal even their mothers names. Surely it is an importantthing that the British Democrat should know something of the origins of,say, Barons Arnold, Passfield, and Snell, seeing that they hold prominentpositions in the affairs of our country.

Then there is Baron Ashfield, whose father changed hisname form Knaties to Stanley; This fact is not given in Burkes Peerage,and we should like to know if he was a Jew.

Have we not a right to know?

What is the use of a peerage reference book which doesnot tell where Jewish blood comes in?

A Statement made by Mr. Shane Leslie that Lard Curzonof Kedleston had a Jewish grandmother, and repeated by B. Falk in He Laughedin Fleet Street has, we understand from Mr. Leslie himself been withdrawnby him. We do not know whether or not it should have been withdrawn.

For over 14 years she had counted Lady Rothschild asher best friend" said Lady Snowden, on March 19 at the Jubilee appealfor the Jewish Association for the Protection of Girls at Grosvenor House,Ark Lane.

The Earls of Listowel and of Warwick helped to directthe Jewish Daily Post of London, which has since gone into liquidation.

According to the Jewish Chronicle of May 10, Lord Wintertonstated in the House of Commons, May 7, that although he was not aware ofany Jewish blood among his ancestors, he would be very proud of it ifthere was. Faugh!

Lady Diana Cooper's child had as its godfather the lateOtto Kahn, of Kuhn and Loeb & Co.

The Balfours, Cecils, Churchills,Lyttons, Russell,and Stanleys seem to have a sort of hereditary lack of Aryan good tastein favoring Jews.

Lady Patricia Moore, daughter of the tenth Earl of Droghedaserved as head of a committee of the British Association of Maccabees in1933, together with the careerist, Mr. Randolph Churchill. This is an exclusivelyJewish national Organization and we do not know what these two were doingthere.

Adultery with Jews accounts for certain cases whereindividuals of obvious Asiatic race suddenly appear in old Aryan familiesof nobility. The usual chain of circumstances in these cases was describedin The Fascist of May 1934, in an article called A Side line of Usury. Itis the greater scandal that these cases may not here be advertised so thatthe Eurasian progeny might be chivvied out of our British aristocracy, whichthey must permanently contaminate.

These Jew-features cross-breeds often further betraythemselves by their instinctive leanings toward Marxism and finance andby a preference and sympathy for Jewish company and Jewish causes. Theyoften live under the perpetual shadow of Jewish blackmail. Generally speakingwhen people of Aryan family look like Jews, they are Jewish.

 Knights of England

The list of Jewish knights which follows gives no realidea of the Jewish contamination of the once-prized honor of knighthood.It is far more difficult to get at the ancestry of holders of non hereditarytitles than it is of the others. It easier for your Jewish knight to camouflagehimself, and there is not doubt whatever that here are as many Marrano Jewstoday in this country working for Jewry under Christianized names and underthe Christian religion as ever there were in Spain and Portugal. We includein the list below only names of living knights of undoubted Jewish blood;we know there are scores of others, and we may be able to add to the listin future editions, particularly if our readers will assist us in the businessof identification.

The appointments mentioned here are either past or presentones.

122 Knights

Widows of Jewish knights. with title of Lady.

24 Lady

So there is something rotten in Denmark.

We ask our readers to join us and to help rouse whatis left of the great British Nation to race-consciousness. No man or womancan escape the responsibility which the knowledge given in this pamphletforces upon them. The tasks cannot be left to future generations, becauseevery generation will be more Judaized then the one before it. The greatJew-wise reformer, William Cobbett thus addressed the nobility of his day(about 1827) in his letter to the Nobility of England: "You feel ** * that you are not the men your grandfathers were; but your have comeinto your present state by slow degrees, and therefore you cannot tell,even to yourselves, not only how the change has come about, but you cannottell what sort of change it really is. However * * * when you reflect thatyour grandfathers would as soon have thought of dining with a chimney sweepthan dining with a Jew or with any huckstering reptile who has amassed moneyby watching the turn of the market; that those grandfathers would have thoughtit no dishonor at all to sit at table with farmers, or even with laborers,that they would have shunned the usurious tribe of loan jobbers, and othernotorious changers of money as they would have shunned the whirlwind orthe pestilence

Gentlemen, You have been warned- keep troth

(Current engagements on going to press: The Marquisof Queensberry's daughter to Count Bendem, son of the new Jew Baron de Forest.)

Revised to November 30, 1937, enlarged with additionof new names and removal of others through death, and three cases througherror.