AMERICA DECIDES 2004. Kerry machine and concerns about Dean sway Iowa Jews,
By Ron Kampeas, Jewish Telegraphic Agency,
January 20, 2004
"Jewish voters in Iowa turned to Sen. John Kerry in large numbers because
of a well-oiled machine that targeted Jews —
and because of ongoing concerns about Howard Dean, activists there say.
Alan Koslow, a Dean activist who hosted a caucus in West Des Moines —
where many of the state’s Jews live — said he and his wife were the only
Jews in the room Monday night voting for Dean, the former Vermont governor
who was the early Democratic front-runner in Iowa. “I was absolutely
shocked,” Koslow said. “The Jewish vote went so completely to
Kerry, from what I could ascertain. He made a strong impression.”
Koslow attributed the performance of Kerry (D-Mass.) to eight young
Jewish campaign staffers who targeted the community. Koslow also had three
helpers but said he only reached about 400 of Iowa’s 1,300 known Jewish
families in the days before the election. An evening for Jewish voters
that Koslow hosted last week with Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a
Jewish Democrat from neighboring Illinois, attracted far fewer people than
expected. “I expected 100; about 45 came,” he said. “About a quarter of
those were people who supported other candidates and who
were upset at Dean’s perceived positions on Israel.”
Dean once called for the United States to take an
“even-handed” policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and once
referred to Hamas terrorists as “soldiers.” Dean
says he now regrets using the term “even-handed: ... Kerry was seen
as the strongest performer at a synagogue event in Des Moines in November,
and several congregants told him afterward that he had swung their support
away from other candidates. Dean and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) also
addressed the crowd. Kerry told the crowd how he had
shouted “Am Yisrael Chai” from atop Masada, and he was the only one of the
three to invoke the Holocaust, when he called for more thoughtful U.S.
involvement in human-rights issues. Such particulars — and Kerry’s
animated delivery — registered with the crowd. “ John
Kerry has been to Masada,” David Moskowitz said at the
synagogue event. “ He knows the issues.”
AMERICA DECIDES 2004. Edwards doesn’t cultivate Jews, but his views win
Jewish support,
By Matthew E. Berger, Jewish Telegraphic Agency,
January 20, 2004
"Sen. John Edwards ... is an exception in a presidential campaign marked by
loud declarations of Jewish affinity. He has warm ties
with Jews in his state, but he hasn’t made an issue of it. Edwards
was a highly successful trial lawyer in North Carolina seven years ago when
he sought a seat in the U.S. Senate and largely was able to self-finance his
campaign. That meant Edwards didn’t spend as much time as other aspiring
lawmakers courting support and dollars in the Jewish community, both in and
out of his state, North Carolina Jewish activists said. “He didn’t seek out
the Jewish community,” unlike others who “go from
candidate event to candidate event begging for money,” said
Jennifer Laszlo-Mizrahi, a Democratic political consultant who ran for
Congress in North Carolina in 1994. “Because he was self-financed, he could
avoid a lot of that.” Edwards nonetheless has earned the community’s
support. He has a solid record on Israel and
emphasizes the issues that resonate with Jewish voters like Dricker:
health, education and poverty. ... “If somebody had told me John Edwards was
going to run for political office, I wouldn’t have believed them,” said
Fred Baron, co-finance chairman of Edwards’
campaign and former president of the Association of Trial Lawyers of
America ... “When he decided to run for political office, it made incredible
sense to me because of his incredible talent to connect with people,” said
Bill Cassell, a longtime Edwards friend and
former Jewish federation campaign chairman in Greensboro ...
Randall Kaplan, a Greensboro businessman who is a
board member for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee,
remembers early meetings Edwards held with Jewish leaders in the community.
“When he first started considering the Senate race, he
was a great listener,” Kaplan said. “He was as knowledgeable
as someone can get when they first run for office but didn’t have first-hand
experience.” Edwards reached out to the Jewish
community as a Senate candidate but didn’t court Jews the same way
other aspiring politicians do. “He would certainly
have ties to individuals in the Jewish community, but I don’t know
that he has had any ties in any formal way,” Broun said. The North
Carolina Jewish community also may not warrant the same treatment that Jews
in larger states merit. “It’s a different kind of Jewish community,”
Broun said. “Most of us are professional people who might be quite
comfortable but are not business people with the kind of money that one
would go to in Florida, Illinois or New York.” Laszlo-Mizrahi said, “That
huge Jewish political machine in North Carolina just doesn’t exist.”
Upon his election in 1998, Edwards continued listening. “John
would always make himself available to us,” Kaplan said ...
Kaplan now advises Edwards’ campaign on Israel and
Middle East issues. Edwards visited Israel with Intelligence Committee
colleagues in 2001 and was there when a suicide bomber attacked a
Sbarro restaurant in downtown Jerusalem. “I think the trip left on him an
understanding,” Kaplan said. “He really gets the strategic issues,
the existential issues.” In a statement to JTA, Edwards said he would
increase U.S. engagement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the
appointment of a senior envoy to the region, and he
signaled support for Israel’s anti-terror tactics, including the security
barrier Israel is erecting in the West Bank. “As long as the
Palestinian leadership fails to end terror, Israel has a right to take
measures to defend itself,” Edwards said. “Such defensive measures are not
the cause of terrorism — they are the response to terrorism.”
AMERICA DECIDES 2004. As Gephardt bows out, Jews lose a friend in
Washington’s high places,
By Matthew E. Berger, Jewish Telegraphic Agency,
January 20, 2004
"The political career of one of Congress’ strongest advocates for Jewish
concerns may be over. Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.), who served as
Democratic leader in the House from 1989 to 2002, ended his presidential bid
Tuesday, a day after he captured only 11 percent of the vote and finished a
disappointing fourth in the Iowa caucuses, which he won in 1988. “Today my
pursuit of the presidency has reached its end,” Gephardt said Tuesday in a
tearful press conference in St. Louis. “I’m withdrawing as a candidate and
returning to private life after a long time in the warm light of public
service.” Gephardt, 62, previously had announced that he would not seek
re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives, thus ending a Washington
career that began when he joined the House in 1977. “A lot of Jewish
Democrats are quite saddened by the apparent end of Dick Gephardt’s
political career,” said Ira Forman, executive director of the
National Jewish Democratic Council. “He was always a friend, not just on
domestic issues, but on Israel.” Gephardt
always was considered a friend on Middle East matters, but
Jewish officials in Washington said he became a leader
on behalf of Israel in recent years — perhaps because of his aspirations to
higher office, but also because of the new international landscape
after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Gephardt
was the highest-ranking congressional official to speak at an April 15,
2002, solidarity rally for Israel at the Capitol."
US Vetoes At The UN In
Favor Of Israel Since 1973,
rense.com, January 20, 2004
"July 1973, S/10974 Vote: 13 in favor, 1 veto (US), 1 abstention. The
resolution strongly deplored Israel's occupation of the Arab territories
since 1967, and expressed serious concern with the Israeli authorities' lack
of cooperation with the UN Special Representative of the Secretary General.
January 1976, S/11940 Vote: 9 in favor, 1 veto (US), 3 abstentions .
The resolution called for Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Arab
territories since 1967, and deplored Israel's refusal to implement relevant
UN resolutions. It furthermore reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian
people to self determination, and the right of return for Palestinian
refugees" ... [Etc., etc., etc. A long list]
Chairman Pledges Closer Cooperation with NATO,
U.S. Info. State. Gov, January 21, 2004
"Passy, de Hoop Scheffer meet in Brussels Jan. 21. The new
chairman-in-office of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE), Bulgarian Foreign Minister Solomon Passy, met in
Brussels January 21 with the new secretary-general of NATO, Jaap de Hoop
Scheffer. Passy pledged to strengthen OSCE cooperation with NATO,
particularly in the fight against terrorism and
in resolving regional conflicts and building democracy
in the Balkans, the Caucasus and Central Asia, according to an OSCE press
release. He described NATO and OSCE antiterrorism efforts as "mutually
reinforcing" and said that building civil societies in all five Central
Asian nations must be a priority. Following is the press release: ..."
Benador Associates Announce First Lecture in New 'Axis of Evil Series';
Journalist Claudia Rosett Speak on North Korea,
U.S. Newswire, January 27, 2004
"Eleana Benador and Benador Associates announce the inaugural
event in a new series of lectures, the "Axis Of Evil Series." The
first event will feature distinguished journalist Claudia Rosett, editorial
contributor to the Wall Street Journal, and fellow of the Hudson Institute
and Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Rosett will speak on "The
Need For Regime Change In North Korea: Facing Facts" on Tuesday, Jan.
27, from 12:30 -- 2 p.m. EST."
Council for the National Interest -- Public Hearing: The Middle East in
Election 2004 -- Voting Out the Neocons,
U.S. Newswire, January 22, 2004
"Contact: Terry Walz of the Council for the National Interest, 202
863-2951 News Advisory: When: Jan. 27 10:00 AM -- 12:00 PM Where: Room 2237
Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC Two former Republican
congressmen, Paul Findley (R-Ill.) and Paul "Pete" McCloskey (R-Calif.),
Edward Peck, a former Chief of Mission in Baghdad, and Civic Leader Dr. E.
Faye Williams will appear at a Public Hearing in Room 2237 Rayburn House
Office Building on Jan. 27. The Jan. 27 event, between 10 am and 12 noon,
will launch a major new series of hearings called "The Middle East in
Election 2004." The first hearing will focus on
"Voting Out the Neocons." The series will follow the presidential
candidates' statements and positions while proposing a new policy approaches
for peace in the Middle East in the interest of
Americans. Findley has stated that the central issue of the 2004
election will be the failure of the Bush administration to deal effectively
and honestly with terrorism. "The real ground zero of
the war on terrorism is in Palestine, not in Manhattan," he says. The
task for American voters in this fall's national election is to reverse the
direction of US Middle East policy and vote the
Neocons and President Bush out of office. Peck considers the war in
Iraq a Pandora's box. He believes America has made critical mistakes, with
potentially far-reaching implications for the entire world. Its effects will
have especially negative implications for the US and Israel. McCloskey will
examine whether the President has given in to the religious fundamentalists
in America, provoking an increase in fundamentalism in the Muslim world. The
speakers call on the American people to replace Bush and his Neocon advisers
with an administration that will re-earn the trust of the world and of the
American people."
Lantos to Check Libya's WMD Program,
Las Vegas Sun, January 21, 2004
"A senior Democratic congressman plans to go to Libya this weekend at the
invitation of Moammar Gadhafi to check on the Libyan leader's pledge to
dismantle his nation's nuclear weapons program. Rep. Tom Lantos,
D-Calif., will meet with Libyan officials and possibly
Gadhafi, whose decision to halt development of weapons of mass
destruction marked a major policy shift by the North African leader.
Lantos, senior Democrat on the House International
Relations Committee, will report his findings to Congress and to the
Bush administration, his office said in a statement announcing the trip. A
separate congressional group headed by Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., is going to
Libya, as well. The visits signal a growing momentum to repair U.S.
relations with Libya, although the administration has taken no action to
remove Libya from its list of countries that support terrorism or to lift
the economic sanctions the listing requires. Through a third party,
Libya also has had preliminary discussions with Israel,
a longtime foe."
Jewish lawyer named French junior minister,
Jerusalem Post, January 22, 2004
"The government named an Algerian-born Jewish lawyer on Thursday to replace
a junior minister who resigned after being named a suspect in a corruption
probe. Nicole Guedj, 48, took over from Pierre Bedier as secretary of
state for building programs in the justice system. She
will oversee the construction of prisons, courthouses and other such
buildings. Bedier, 46, resigned Wednesday shortly after being placed
under investigation in a corruption probe centered on bribes for public
contracts in the town where he once was mayor. He has denied any wrongdoing.
Guedj was born of a North African Jewish family in Algeria in May
1955, when it was still a part of France. The lawyer helps handle human
rights issues for the UMP, President Jacques Chirac's party. She also was
part of a Chirac-appointed commission that recently called for the banning
of Islamic head scarves, Jewish skullcaps and large Christian crosses in
public schools to keep them free of religious strife. The government plans
to institute the ban with a law to be put in place for the start of the
2004-2005 school year in September."
Jews’ Primary Role Expanding. Race on to pick off Lieberman contributors;
N.Y. vote looming larger,
by James D. Besser, Jewish Week, January
23, 2004
"As the battle for the Democratic presidential nomination shifts to New
Hampshire, the Jewish community stands poised to play
a dramatically expanded role, observers say.
The big reason: money. That could be an especially important factor
for Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the surprise victor in Monday’s Iowa
caucuses. Kerry, according to Jewish activists in the state, surged among
Jewish voters in the last days of the caucus fight. But it also could be a
major factor for Wesley Clark, the retired general who bypassed Iowa and
will make his first electoral stand next week in the New England chill.
“The importance of Jews in the Democratic Party is
suddenly greater than it was a few days ago,” said Johns Hopkins University
political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg.
“And the probable beneficiaries are Kerry and possibly Clark.” The
Iowa surprise also increases the likelihood several
primaries in states with large Jewish populations — including New York and
Florida — could figure more prominently in the Democratic free-for-all ...
Even before Iowa, several campaigns were ratcheting up their Jewish
outreach efforts. This week the Clark campaign was staging a nationwide
Jewish “house party,” bringing together young Jewish activists — Jewish
Theological Seminary students were to meet Wednesday — to watch a filmed
biography of the former NATO commander and discuss how they can help the
campaign. James Rubin, the former Clinton administration State
Department spokesman recently appointed senior foreign policy to the Clark
team, has invited New Hampshire Jewish leaders to lunch on Friday to discuss
the campaign. Clark backers have held Jewish events in Oklahoma and Florida
in the past month. Clark also received the endorsement of a senior Jewish
member of Congress, Rep. Martin Frost (D-Texas). A campaign spokesman
said that “the goal is to establish General Clark as someone who is every
strong on security, but is also an active and experienced peacemaker.” A
senior Kerry campaign official said “a lot of Jewish voters have been
looking for an alternative to Dean. The Iowa results could put Kerry in that
position, and we plan to take advantage of it.” No Jewish Consensus
In New Hampshire New Hampshire Jews are
disproportionately involved in the political dogfight — a prominent rabbi in
the state estimated that “two-thirds of my congregants have met or listened
to one or more of the candidates” — but the community has not shown
an overwhelming preference for any of the major candidates ... Allen
Solomont, a Kerry campaign steering committee
co-chair, said that “people in our community
admire John Kerry for his consistent and unshakable support for Israel,
his mature and intelligent foreign policy experience and perspective, and
his positions on domestic issues. He has the whole package.” Jewish votes
are unlikely to play much of a role in the next few primaries, including the
contest in New Hampshire and the slew of Southern primaries on Feb. 3.
But with the dramatic changes in the Democratic
nomination race, Jewish campaign money is taking on even more importance
than usual. “People were saying that Dean showed a new way to
raise money through the Internet that circumvented the traditional
contributors, including many Jews,” said Ginsberg, the Johns Hopkins
political scientist. “But it looks like the old ways are still the best. Now
there’s going to be a scramble for Jewish money.” The scramble will be all
the more intense because Kerry and Clark go into New Hampshire without
enough cash in the coffers to sustain all-out campaigns. Speaking about
Kerry, Goldstein said: “To capitalize on his momentum, he will have
to raise a lot of money quickly. And American Jews are significant
supporters of the Democratic Party, and they tend to
work in networks that can produce contributions quickly" ... The Iowa
results, by slowing the Dean surge and boosting Kerry and Edwards,
also could magnify the importance of several primaries
in states with large Jewish populations. “With the possibility this
will be a more extended primary process than many had anticipated, the New
York primary could be a significant event,” said Steven Grossman,
national CO-chair of the Dean campaign and a longtime
pro-Israel activist. “And with the big Jewish vote in New York, there
will be tremendous competition between the candidates.” New York, California
and Maryland hold their primaries on March 2; in all three, the Jewish vote
could play an important role. Floridians vote the following week, another
state with a big Jewish electorate ... Grossman, the Dean campaign
CO-chair, said: “I’ve been struck by how many Jewish contributors are
staying on the sidelines even at this point. One
reason is that they have so many friends in the race; they don’t want
to make enemies.”
Report: Rumsfeld considers striking Hizbullah to provoke Syria,
By Douglas Davis, Jerusalem Post,
January 22, 2004
"US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is
considering provoking a military confrontation with Syria by attacking
Hizbullah bases near the Syrian border in Lebanon, according to the
authoritative London-based Jane's Intelligence Digest. In an article to be
published on Friday, the journal said multifaceted US
attacks, which would be conducted within the
framework of the global war on terrorism, are likely to focus on
Hizbullah bases in the Bekaa Valley of eastern Lebanon.
It noted that the deployment of US special forces in
the Bekaa Valley, where most of Syria's occupation forces in Lebanon are
based, would be highly inflammatory and would "almost certainly involve a
confrontation with Syrian troops." Such a conflict might well prove to be
the objective of the US, said the journal, which described
Washington's strategic benefits from a confrontation with Syria. These
include: * Pressuring Damascus into ending its support for anti-Israel
Palestinian groups; * Persuading Syria to abandon its weapons of mass
destruction and to withdraw its troops from Lebanon; * Stimulating a
situation where Syrian leader Bashir Assad can be ousted; * Crushing
Hizbullah and ending its presumed connections with al-Qaida. "The political
consequences of a US attack against Lebanon. . . could result in the
destabilization of a country that is still rebuilding its infrastructure a
decade after a ruinous 15-year civil war," noted the journal. "It
would also fuel Muslim and Arab hostility toward the US at a time when
US-led occupation forces are fighting the ongoing insurgency in Iraq. "In
these circumstances, taking on Hizbullah in the Bekaa Valley is likely to
prove a highly risky undertaking. "However," it continued, "given the
Bush administration's doctrine of pre-emptive strikes, it remains entirely
possible that Washington will soon launch military strikes against Lebanon,
regardless of the consequences for wider regional stability." The journal
noted that the US administration has long considered Damascus "a prime
candidate for regime-change," along with Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and,
possibly, Saudi Arabia. "Syria, once a powerhouse of Arab radicalism that
could not be ignored, has been seriously weakened, both militarily and
politically. Washington may feel that the time is coming to oust Assad and
the ruling generals ... During the past six months, it added, Washington has
increased the US military presence along the Syrian border with Iraq "and,
on several occasions, has sent special forces into Syrian territory or
penetrated Syrian air space. "In one incident, US troops pursued suspected
Iraqi militants into Syria and fought a running battle that left dozens of
people, including some Syrians, dead. "Israel's air-strike in southern
Lebanon earlier this week," it added, "is very unlikely to be the last time
Israeli forces cross the border to strike at targets alleged to be militant
bases and training camps."
American
Democrat hopefuls sticking to pro-Israel policies,
by Nathan Guttman,
Haaretz (Israel), January 22, 2004
"Surprising results this week in the Iowa primary have caused the American
Jewish community, and supporters of Israel in the United States, to take a
closer look at Democratic candidates who have up to now been trailing the
pack. In past months, the Jewish community was preoccupied with then
front-runner Howard Dean. It monitored closely what appeared to be worrisome
comments made by Dean, particularly his reference to
an "evenhanded approach" toward the Middle East conflict. Though the
obsession with Dean obscured the other candidates, the
other Democratic Party hopefuls did not forget the Jewish community.
On Wednesday, Wesley Clark's staff organized a nationwide event aimed
at his Jewish supporters. In dozens of cities around the country, rallies
were held for Clark, and the retired general greeted his supporters in
conference calls. Clark tried to allay Jewish voters' fears, most of them
related to Israel. "I believe we should take risks for peace, and we will
reach peace in the Middle East," Clark declared. He declined, however, to
detail a peace plan. He did take a hard line toward the Arab countries.
"Years ago, I saw that the Palestinians are teaching
hate in classrooms, and I am also worried about the Saudis preaching hate.
When I am president, I will take action against that," he stated.
Clark struck a similar chord in his comments on Iran. He anticipated
democratic reform in Tehran: "I am convinced that if we can get Western
culture and Western ideas that are suitable for the younger generation
[there], we will see a change in this society," he said. Clark indicated
also that Syria should undertake reforms. While he is careful not to side
with the conservatives in the Bush administration who evince full or partial
support for the military option vis-a-vis Damascus,
Clark recommended playing tough with the Syrians. U.S. policy toward
Damascus, he declared, should aim at "breaking the grip of the extremists
surrounding Bashar Assad. We want to see there an evolution that will end
the threat on Israel and will enable them to reach a peace agreement with
Israel, without Israel having to give assets
needed for its security." As far as American Jews are concerned, the jury is
still out on the Democratic Party's new star, John Kerry. An experienced
politician with 18 years on the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee under
his belt, he has a solid record of supporting Israel.
American Jewish sources in Washington indicated that Kerry's comments in
off-the-record talks recall the approach adopted by the Clinton
administration: unqualified support for Israel,
yet also insistence that a resolution to the conflict with the Palestinians
depends upon Israeli concessions in the territories ... The bottom line,
says one seasoned political observer in Washington, is that
Israel has nothing to fear from Kerry, Clark or other
Democratic hopefuls. All of the candidates endorse their party's supportive
stance toward Israel, and the candidates are surrounded by staff workers who
are long-standing friends of Israel."
Palestine Media Watch,
January 16, 2003
"The Stars and Stripes, the official newspaper
of the US armed forces, published today an unprecedented op-ed from
Adm. Thomas Moorer, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1970 to 1974
and former 7th Fleet commander, which alleges not
merely timidity by the US government in seeking the truth about what
happened to the USS Liberty when it was attacked by Israeli airforce jets,
but accuses the US government of outright cover-up and deception. The
US media, as usual taking its cues from the US government, has been very
timid in tackling this dark episode. But now that the Stars and Stripes
has run this powerful op-ed, clearly at least the US military has lifted the
taboo status off this tragedy. So, let's alert the media that it is ok for
them to start talking about and investigating this episode. Please take the
time to: 1. Write a letter: Email: letters@pstripes.osd.mil Phone:
202-761-0900 Use the
PMWATCH interface: Circulate this op-ed and push your local paper to run
this it and to pursue stories on the 1967 attack against the USS Liberty.
Media contact information can be found at:
http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/contact/media.html The Stars and Stripes
does not publish its op-eds on-line, but a pdf of the op-ed can be fount at:
http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/cast/Proof_BROO_OPIN_46216.pdf For more on
The Stars and Stripes, please go to:
http://www.stripes.com/about/aboutstripes.html# Contacts: For more on the
attack on The USS Liberty, please go to:
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ussliberty.html Palestine Media
Watch http://www.pmwatch.org (610)
993-0608 "
AIPAC Hosts Annual NY Event: Rep. DeLay, Rep. Menendez to Address Dinner;
Regional Award to Be Presented to Howard Jonas,
U.S. Newswire, January 23, 2004
"On Thursday, Jan. 29, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
will host its annual NY membership event, expected to draw over 1,000
people, including numerous federal and local elected
officials and U.N. Ambassadors and dignitaries from over 40 countries across
the globe. The event brings together national and local
representatives, community leaders and Israeli officials from across the
political spectrum to focus attention on the
importance of the U.S.-Israel relationship. AIPAC's Annual Northeast
Regional Dinner is consistently the largest pro-Israel event in the region.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and Democratic Caucus Chair Robert
Menendez (D-N.J.) will deliver keynote addresses.
Both Reps. DeLay and Menendez have been outstanding leaders in working to
shape U.S. Middle East policy and making sure the
U.S.-Israel relationship remains strong. The event will also honor
Howard Jonas, a long-time supporter of a strong U.S.-Israel relationship
and member of AIPAC's National Board of Directors.
Consistently ranked as the most influential foreign policy lobbying
organization on Capitol Hill, AIPAC is an American membership organization
that seeks to strengthen the relationship between Israel and the United
States ... Howard S. Jonas is widely considered a
revolutionary figure in the international telecommunications sector and one
of our community's most devoted political activists. Howard founded IDT
Corporation in August 1990 and has served as Chairman of the Board and
Treasurer since its inception. IDT is a model of upstart entrepreneurship.
Howard brings the same vitality and commitment he has for business to his
work with America's only pro-Israel lobby - AIPAC."
'Jewish lobby' is an anti-Semitic term, says US diplomat Gerald Kaufman:
Tories show faith in Jewish leaders despite tradition of prejudice,
By Mary Dejevsky, The Independent (UK), 23
January 2004
"A senior US diplomat in London has ruffled feathers in Britain's foreign
policy establishment by publicly implying that a reference to the "Jewish
lobby" in the United States is an anti-Semitic remark. The incident happened
yesterday at a Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) lecture on US
foreign policy given by David Johnson, who is the second in command at the
American embassy in London. During the question-and-answer session he was
asked: "Will the US ever be willing to impose an equitable peace settlement
in the Middle East, or is it perhaps that the Jewish
lobby in America is too strong to make that feasible?" Mr Johnson
responded indignantly, saying: "I am highly resentful of the last part of
your remarks, just because of its ethnic slur." And he went on: "During my
time here I have become increasingly troubled by the willingness of European
audiences to skirt up to the side of anti-Semitic language as a political
criticism." A retired US diplomat, now living in
Britain, rose to defend the earlier questioner, objecting that Mr
Johnson's remark reflected the American tendency to associate criticism of
Israeli policy with criticism of Jews. "There is
nothing racial about drawing attention to the existence of a particular
ethnic group," he said, noting that the US had not only "a strong
Israeli lobby" but Irish, Polish and other ethnic lobbies. There was a shout
of "hear, hear" from the audience and applause rang around the crowded hall.
Mr Johnson, who was US policy co-ordinator for Afghanistan before arriving
in London in August, is an experienced State Department hand with extensive
service in Europe. One of his tasks in London appears to be to woo back
members of the British political, academic and media circles who felt
alienated by George Bush's foreign policy, especially the war in Iraq, which
is unlikely to be advanced by the exchanges. Later, Mr Johnson said he held
"no animus" towards the questioner, saying that what he found unacceptable
about the use of the term was its inference that "somehow the Jews control
the US". He said he was surprised that the term was still so current in
Europe, and especially in Britain, noting: "That is an
unacceptable formulation."
18 Percent of Britons Don't Want Jewish Prime Minister,
Guardian (UK), PM Friday January 23, 2004
"Eighteen percent of Britons do not want a Jewish prime minister, while 15
percent believe the scale of the Holocaust has been exaggerated, according
to a poll published Friday. The ICM survey for the Jewish Chronicle,
a weekly newspaper, comes as Jewish groups warn of rising anti-Semitism in
Europe. The European Union is convening a conference on the issue.
Michael Howard, leader of Britain's main
opposition Conservative Party, is Jewish, and stands to become prime
minister if the party wins the next national election. Home Secretary
David Blunkett called the survey results worrisome. ``It means people are
prepared to set aside not only the evidence (for the Holocaust), but the
overwhelming emotion that goes with it,'' he said. The poll found that 18
percent disagreed with the statement that a Jewish prime minister would be
``equally acceptable'' to a leader from any other faith. About 53 percent
agreed with that statement. Lord Janner, chairman of the Holocaust
Educational Trust and vice president of the World Jewish Congress, said
opposition to a Jewish prime minister was ``extraordinary,'' considering
that Benjamin Disraeli held the post in the late 19th century.
Disraeli was born Jewish but was baptized a Christian as a child."
Israel supporters in cabinet Jewish state has friends in the new Martin
government, says Owen
by PAT JOHNSON, Jewish Western Bulletin,
January 9, 2004
"Pro-Israel members of Parliament have significantly
more strength in the new Liberal government under Paul Martin, according to
Stephen Owen, member of Parliament for Vancouver-Quadra and the new minister
of public works and government services. About a year ago, Owen and
about two dozen other Liberal MPs formed Liberal Parliamentarians for
Israel, which is now an official caucus committee. In the new
cabinet, unveiled by Martin last month, members of the
pro-Israel caucus were given significant new positions, including
Irwin Cotler's appointment as minister of justice. Cotler, MP for
the Montreal riding of Mount Royal, is a former head of Canadian Jewish
Congress. Along with Owen, other cabinet members who belong to the
pro-Israel group include Ontario MPs Joe Volpe (minister of human
resources and skills development), Carolyn Bennett (minister of state for
public health) and Jim Peterson (minister of international trade).
Vancouver-area Sen. Jack Austin, who is Jewish,
has been appointed leader of the government in the
Senate, another cabinet position. Returning to cabinet
is another member of the pro-Israel group,
Montreal MP Lucienne Robillard, the minister of industry. Owen, who was
first elected in 2000, previously served as secretary of state for western
economic diversification, Indian affairs and northern development. Earlier,
he served as parliamentary secretary to the minister of justice. Liberal
Parliamentarians for Israel have issued a number of position papers, which
were presented to Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham in a meeting last
year. They outline the committee's stand on Israeli-Palestinian affairs,
expressing specific concern over issues such as the language used around the
debate. "Cycle of violence," for example, is a bugbear of a term, which Owen
said distorts the reality of the conflict, with
Palestinian terror put on an equal footing with Israel's right to defend its
civilian citizenry. "It suggests an equivalency that does not
properly describe the dynamics of violence in the Middle East," he said.
Other issues the committee has explicitly addressed include Israeli soldiers
missing in action in Lebanon, the struggle for recognition of Magen David
Adom, the Israeli equivalent of Red Cross and Red Crescent, and the
application to the CRTC by operators seeking to bring the Arab news channel
Al-Jazeera to Canadian television viewers. The committee is also set to
consider any Canadian complicity in funding Palestinian school materials
that incite young people to violence and hatred. Though Liberal
Parliamentarians for Israel is a small group of MPs, Owen said the
orientation of the committee has not met with any disagreement within the
larger government caucus. "I have not heard one thing
in three years [from other Liberal MPs] that would contradict the thrust of
[the committee's views on Israel]," Owen said.
"It's not as if there is an acrimonious debate, or any debate, going on"
... Owen acknowledged that most members of the
committee are either Jewish or represent ridings with significant Jewish
populations. Though his own Vancouver-Quadra riding is home to part
of British Columbia's Jewish community, Owen has more personal connections
as well, being married to Diane Koerner, a
member of a prominent Vancouver Jewish family."
Parents
of activist killed by bulldozer criticize Israeli investigation,
By Tarek El-Tablawy, Detroit News, January 23,
2004
"The parents of an American activist crushed to death by an Israeli army
bulldozer in a Palestinian refugee camp criticized the Israeli government
for not releasing the investigation report and renewed calls for an
independent examination of their daughter’s death. Rachel Corrie, 23, of
Olympia, Wash., was killed March 16 while trying to prevent the bulldozer
from razing the home of a Palestinian pharmacist in Rafah, along the border
with Egypt. An Israeli army investigation concluded Corrie’s death was
accidental, with officials saying the driver of the machine could not see
the woman. But Corrie’s parents, Craig and Cindy Corrie, say Israeli
officials are stonewalling efforts to release the report to U.S.
representatives. “What we want is what Prime Minister (Ariel)
Sharon promised President Bush, an open and
transparent investigation into Rachel’s death. We haven’t gotten that,”
said Craig Corrie. “If (the bulldozer driver and the commander) are
innocent, then there’s no reason not to release the report and there’s no
reason not to welcome an independent investigation,” he said shortly before
a Michigan fund-raiser for the International Solidarity Movement, the
pro-Palestinian activist group for which Rachel Corrie worked when she died.
Israeli officials view ISM activists as meddlers whose actions range from
negligence to outright abetting of terrorism. A message seeking comment was
left with the Israeli Consulate in Chicago on Friday.
Cindy Corrie said according to eyewitnesses to the incident, her daughter
was atop a mound of rubble and was clearly visible to the driver. “She stood
her place and stared him in the eye. She thought he would stop, like they’d
done in the past,” she said. “But he didn’t stop.” Joining the
Corries at the fund-raiser was Brian Avery, a 26-year-old ISM activist from
Chapel Hill, N.C. who was shot in the face by
machine-gun fire in the West Bank town of Jenin shortly after Corrie was
killed. Another ISM volunteer from Britain was also shot last April while
helping school children to safety and died earlier this month. Along
with helping raise funds for the ISM -- whose members often place themselves
between Israeli forces and Palestinians -- the Corries are hoping to muster
more support for the Rachel Corrie Resolution. The
resolution, introduced in the House last March, calls for an investigation
by the U.S. government into her death. In the past 10 months, only 51
legislators have signed it. For the Corries, it has been hard to
understand why so few have thrown their support behind the resolution. “What
Rachel was doing was trying to call attention to the suffering of the
ordinary Palestinian people. These were not the houses of terrorists that
were razed,” Cindy Corrie said. “It’s hard to explain why there isn’t more
support for it except that there’s a reluctance on the
part of Congressmen to challenge Israel,” she said."
The
Neocon Case for Imprisoning and Executing Congressional War Opponents,
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Lew Rockwell.com,
January 15, 2004
"The neocon cabal is beginning to make the case for imprisoning – or
possibly executing – members of Congress who oppose the war in Iraq. An
example of this development is a December 23 Insight magazine article
by senior editor J. Michael Waller entitled "When
Does Politics Become Treason?" (Insight is an appendage of the
Washington Times, the voice of the Washington, D.C. neocon establishment.
Just before our May 2002 Independent Institute debate on Lincoln,
Straussian neocon high priest Harry Jaffa
made it a point to tell me that he is the chairman
of the academic advisory committee of the Washington Times,
where his colleague MacKubin Thomas Owens had just published an intemperate
and apoplectic hatchet job on my book, The Real Lincoln, only a few
weeks after all but comparing Jaffa’s latest book on Lincoln to the
Bible in the same book review section.) Naturally, the
totalitarian/neocon case for imprisoning or executing the Bush
administration’s political opponents is based on precedents established by
Abraham Lincoln. "Lincoln’s policy was to have treasonous federal
lawmakers arrested and tried before military tribunals, and exiled or hanged
if convicted," Waller announces ... And according to Waller,
these words "apply to some lawmakers today," even though these lawmakers
insist that they are opposing the Bush war policy "to support the troops."
Exhibit A in the neocon case for imprisoning political opponents is
Congressman Clement L. Vallandigham of Ohio, who was forcefully taken from
his Dayton, Ohio home in the middle of the night by 67 armed federal
soldiers, thrown into a military prison without due process, convicted by a
military tribunal, and deported ... So, don’t be surprised to see articles
in the near future from the Claremont Institute, AEI, National Review, The
Weekly Standard, and other neocon organs urging
President Bush to be more "Lincolnesque" in his treatment of the war
opponents in Congress."
Lieberman lodges protest with CNN over 'Jew question',
by Janine Zacharia, Jerusalem Post,Jan.
26, 2004
"Senator Joseph Lieberman complained to CNN on Friday after the cable
news channel's anchor, Bill Hemmer, asked the Democratic presidential
candidate how he felt "as a Jew" about the
security fence. A source close to the Lieberman campaign said the
senator "was offended" by Hemmer's questioning
of him "as a Jew." Hemmer called the
Lieberman campaign and apologized, a CNN spokeswoman said. The
question was posed during CNN's America Morning show, which Hemmer
co-hosts. "Senator, as a Jew, do you believe the
construction of the security wall in Israel is the right path to peace?"
Hemmer asked Lieberman. Lieberman replied: "I am
running for president, Bill, as an American who happens to be Jewish. So the
question I believe is inappropriate. I'm going to give you my answer as an
American." Lieberman
said the US should respect Israel's right to defend
itself against terrorism and said he thinks "the wall will help." He
also described it as "temporary," and said the US has "a right as [Israel's]
ally to talk to them about where that wall goes." Referring to Hemmer's
original question, Lieberman added: "But I want to repeat, it's the American
way not to judge candidates by their faith, but by their policies. That's
the way we do it in this country and that's the way I know the American
people will judge me." The source said: "The campaign did call to complain.
Bill Hemmer called back personally to apologize, did so profusely and
honorably, said he did not intend to say anything discriminatory."
The Israel Project:
For Security, Freedom, and Peace,
The Israel Project
"Our team includes the best and brightest in strategic communications:
President: Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi Mizrahi is an expert in
communications, public opinion research, media, and politics. Mizrahi
has worked with the White House, 60 members of the
United States Senate, and 114 members of the United States Congress.
She has had successful communications campaigns in more than twenty
countries. With a passion for advocacy and communications training, Mizrahi
has authored training manuals and major articles on the nuts and bolts of
winning campaigns. All the major US networks and newspapers have interviewed
her. She has degrees in Judaic Studies and International Studies from Emory
University. Mizrahi is the creator and
day-to-day manager of The Israel Project. Key Strategist for
Quantitative Research and Strategy (Europe) : Stanley B. Greenberg,
Ph.D. Greenberg has been orchestrating winning political campaigns
across the US and the world. He has served as lead
polling advisor and strategist to President Bill Clinton and Vice President
Al Gore. He was a key strategist to Prime Minister Tony Blair, Prime
Minister Ehud Barak, German Chancellor
Gerhard Schroeder and others. The London Times noted that
Greenberg is "widely considered the father of
modern polling techniques," while Esquire voted Greenberg one
of the top twenty-one innovators, creates and thinkers of the 21st century.
Greenberg received his Ph.D. from Yale University and is the author
of several books. Greenberg conducted numerous polls for The
Israel Project and has worked with key Israeli
Spokespeople and officials communicating with the English language press.
Key Strategist for Dial Testing of Spokespeople, Messages and Ads:
Frank Luntz, Ph.D. Frank Luntz is one of
the most honored political and communication professionals in America today.
He is widely credited for his work on the “Contract with America” and as a
strategist to House Leader Tom DeLay, and to former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Time magazine named Luntz one of “50 of America's most
promising leaders aged 40 and under.” The New York Times wrote that
“his well-chosen words helped turn an election. The “Instant Response” focus
group technique Luntz has pioneered was profiled on 60 Minutes in
1998. He has been a guest on many networks and news shows
and ran focus groups in Iraq during the war for MSNBC.
Luntz got his Ph.D. at Oxford and is the author of several books.
Luntz has conducted The Israel Project's dial
testing, including sessions with opinion elites, college students and Jews.
His “Talking Points” message manuals on how to speak on Israel and the
crisis are being used by leading Israeli and pro-Israel spokespeople.
Go to www.luntz.com for more information
on Dr. Luntz's work. Key Strategist for Qualitative and
Quantitative Research: Neil Newhouse. Neil Newhouse is a
partner and co-founder of Public Opinion Strategies, one of the largest
political and public affairs polling firms, recently
named “Pollster of the Year". Newhouse
and his partners have established a client base that ranges from President
Bush to Fortune 500 companies. Newhouse's
firm was behind more Republican victories in the 2002 election than any
other firm. Newhouse's other clients include Senator John
McCain, Governors Bush (Florida), Rowland (Connecticut), Taft (Ohio) and
Swift (Massachusetts) as well as more than twenty-five
US Senators and Congressmen, including Senate Majority Leader, Dr.
Bill Frist ... Go to www.pos.org for more
information on Mr. Newhouse's work. Television and Radio
Advertising Production: Mark Moskowitz. Mark Moskowitz is
one of the world's leading producers and directors of films and television
commercials made to persuade audiences. His
issue-oriented media, including over three thousand
political spots, has been awarded “Pollies” for five years and has
been the subject of features on all the major television networks.
Moskowitz has produced numerous commercials for
The Israel Project. Media & Advocacy Training: Michael
R. Shannon. Shannon is the founder of MANDATE: Message, Media &
Public Relations, a media/public affairs consulting firm specializing in
radio and television advertising. His firm has
participated in over 70 elections on three continents. A former
reporter, Shannon is an expert in media training and has worked at
the highest levels nationally and internationally, helping clients
understand how to communicate effectively with the media. He serves as a
media coach and consultant to The Israel Project. Print Media and
Graphics: Dan Hazelwood. Dan Hazelwood formed Targeted
Creative Communications, a direct marketing company based in Alexandria,
Virginia in 1992. TC2 has worked for campaigns in
virtually every state and all over the globe. His past clients include
George W. Bush for President, Bob Dole for President, several US Senators,
Governors, and members of the House of Representatives. Campaigns
& Elections magazine named Hazelwood a "rising star" of the
political consulting community in 1994 and a "Mover & Shaker" in 1996. Go to
www.targetedcreative.com for
more information on Mr. Hazelwood's work."
Mirth of a Nation, How Bill Clinton learned to tell jokes on
himself--and get the last laugh.
by Mark Katz, Washington Monthly,
January/February 2004
"He opened the door and I jumped to my feet. Watching the president of the
United States enter the room is always a startling sight. Of course, the
sight he encountered might have caught him off-guard too: a nervous guy in a
tuxedo secluded in a dimly-lit holding room with a stack of pages in one
hand and an egg timer in the other. Although this was
the fifth humor speech I had prepared for President Bill Clinton
since he'd taken office, we were about to have our very first one-on-one
meeting. The occasion was the remarks he was about to give to the Alfalfa
Club, the least known of the four annual Washington humor dinners that take
place from January through April--collectively known as the "Silly Season."
And on this snowy night in January of 1995, I was there to fulfill the
duties of what was probably the oddest job description in town:
a presidential joke writer, an adjunct member of the White House
speechwriting staff on retainer by way of the Democratic National Committee.
... Self-deprecating humor comes naturally to only the
most skillful practitioners of public power and your average Jew. At
that moment in his presidency, the benefits of self-directed jokes were not
yet evident to Bill Clinton. As the designated White
House in-house humorist, it was my job to guide him through
Washington's odd humor rituals with my best and funniest suggestions for the
things he might say ... My first conversation with head speechwriter
Michael Waldman that spring set the tone for what was to come."
AJC Expresses Horror at Jerusalem Bus Bombing,
U.S. Newswire, January 29, 2004
"The American Jewish Committee today issued the following statement after a
Palestinian policeman destroyed a Jerusalem city bus, murdering at least 10
and wounding dozens, in a suicide bombing: 'After so many senseless,
barbaric Palestinian terror attacks on Israeli citizens, it is difficult to
find the right words to express our sorrow, our horror, and our anger, yet
today we are even more outraged that a member of the Palestinian Authority
police carried out the bombing in the heart of Israel's capital. We again
are reminded that there are those Palestinians who not only oppose peace,
but who object to the very existence of Israel, whatever its final borders
may be. When the AJC Board of Governors travels to
Israel and meets with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem in the
coming days, we will personally express our deepest sympathies to the people
of Israel, as well as our continuing, unwavering support for Israel's
longstanding quest for peace and security.'"
Jewish Members Predominate
Henry
Kissinger will present the award
Women Protest US Award to Venezuelan Coup Leader Gustavo Cisneros,
Venezuelan News, Jan 29, 2004
"The U.S. based NGO Global Women’s Strike issued a press release today
protesting an award expected to be given by the Inter-American Economic
Council to Gustavo Cisneros, a Venezuelan billionaire identified by sources
such as Newsweek, local Venezuelan publications and analysts as one of the
protagonists and financiers of the April 11, 2002 coup d’etat against
President Hugo Chavez. Cisneros is also credited with being a driving force
behind the December 2002 nationwide lock-out and sabotage of the oil
industry, which instead of ousting President Chávez from his elected office,
drove the Venezuelan economy into the ground by causing a historical drop of
27% in the country’s GDP in the first trimester of 2003. Cisneros is the
owner of AOL, Coca-Cola, DirecTV and Pizza Hut in Latin America, Univision
in the US, and Venezuela’s biggest TV network Venevision. Former U.S.
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who according to declassified
documents headed the CIA operation to overthrow Chilean
democratically-elected President Salvador Allende in 1973, will be in charge
of awarding fellow coup plotter Cisneros. The Global Women’s Strike
statement follows: The Global Women’s Strike condemns the outrageous
decision of theInter-American Economic Council
to honor Latin American media tycoon Gustavo Cisneros at its 2004 Winter
Gala on Thirsday January 29h. It shows once more the total contempt of the
US administration for people’s right to elect their own government. To
recognize as a person who “has consistently sought to create an environment
where business and government can work together in meaningful ways for the
betterment of society,” a man who has systematically used his corporate
wealth and media monopoly to illegally and violently attempt to force from
office the democratically-elected government of Venezuelan President Hugo
Chavez, is particularly cynical ... The Cisneros Group has been implicated
in the December 2003 illegal shipment of US$2.5 million in cash seized
aboard an American Airlines flight from Miami Florida to Caracas, no doubt
intended to help finance another attempted coup against the Venezuelan
people. Gustavo Cisneros personally spoke with the U.S. State Department's
former Latin American Affairs Chief, Otto Reich and the U.S.
Ambassador to Venezuela, Charles Shapiro (currently under fire for
hosting a puppet show ridicule of President Chávez in his home in Caracas)
on the day of the coup, an event reported in Newsweek Magazine (see
Newsweek, April 29, 2002, p.10). To add insult to injury, Henry Kissinger
will be presenting this obscene award. Kissinger is himself a war
criminal and a man reviled all over Latin America, the Caribbean and the
world for leading the CIA overthrow of the democratically-elected government
of Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973. He justified the coup which led to the
disappearances of thousands of people and the exile of hundreds of thousands
with the infamous statement: "I don't see why we need to stand by and watch
a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues
are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for
themselves." Kissinger is also responsible for similar US policies in
Indonesia and Cyprus. He recently had to withdraw his appointment by
President Bush to head a commission investigating 9/11 because his
reputation was too unsavory to give any credibility to the findings. He
cannot travel to many countries for fear of arrest."
New
Mexico Invests in Israel in Many Ways,
Israel National News, January 20, 2004
"The American state of New Mexico has been expanding its contacts,
investments and relationship with Israel. The expanded contacts have been
both official and through private organizations in the southwestern state.
Last month, for the first time, New Mexico invested
$10 million in Israel, in the form of Israel Bonds. State Governor
Bill Richardson presented the check to Harold Albert of Albuquerque,
chairman of Israel Bonds New Mexico, and expressed his support of Israel's
security and economic well-being. In addition, Governor Richardson has
announced that New Mexico, in cooperation with the
Jewish Federation of Greater Albuquerque, is planning a Business Mission to
Israel this coming spring. Mission members will take part in a series
of business meetings customized to the particular needs and interests of
various New Mexico companies. Mission Chairman Morton Lieberman said
that the delegates would focus on commerce, research and development, and
collaboration in hi-tech, security, agriculture and water, and more. Jewish
Federation sources say that the re-opening of the Israel Office of the New
Mexico Department of Economic Development has led to increased efforts to
establish and enhance strong business ties between New Mexico and Israel,
increasing New Mexico's exports and creating more jobs in New Mexico.
Another collaborative initiative to bring New Mexicans to Israel in 2004 is
the Albuquerque Jewish/Christian Solidarity Mission to Israel, set for
March. The local Jewish Federation, in conjunction with Congregation B'nai
Israel, Congregation Albert and Bridges for Peace, is sponsoring the unique
trip."
Erdogan vows to protect Turkey's Jews,
by Melissa Radler, Jerusalem Post,
January 27, 2004
"Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan vowed to stamp out terrorism
and protect his nation's Jews from future attacks during a ceremony in his
honor in New York on Monday. "We will not tolerate terrorism, and we will
act in solidarity to wipe it from the face of the earth," he said
upon receiving the American Jewish Congress's Profile
in Courage award. The first Muslim to ever receive the award, Erdogan
accepted it at an HSBC bank. An HSBC bank in Istanbul was bombed in November
just days after two synagogues in the city were attacked by terrorists.
"There's no need for our Jewish friends to be concerned about the security
of the Jewish community in Turkey because they are our citizens and have
been entrusted to us by the Jewish world," he said. Erdogan told an audience
at the Council on Foreign Relations earlier on Monday that Turkey's foreign
policy is aimed at building peace and cooperation throughout the world. He
also urged the world to recognize Turkey's past deeds,
and called on Yad Vashem to grant the Righteous Among the Nations award to
several Turks who saved Jews during World War II ... After his
American Jewish Congress speech, which was attended by diplomats from
Russia, China, Spain, Belgium, Germany, and Grenada, Erdogan asked Israel's
deputy permanent representative to the UN, Ambassador Arye Mekel, to
relay a message to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. "He said that he's
ready to do whatever he can for the peace process," Mekel said. "He
said that whatever is good for Israel is good for the region."
[Morris: Kerry Likely to Tap Hillary for VP,
Newsmax, January 28, 2004
"If Sen. John Kerry winds up as the Democratic nominee next summer, the
first phone call he's likely to make is to Sen. Hillary Clinton - to ask her
to be his running mate. That's the prediction of Dick Morris, whose
advice made Bill Clinton the only Democratic president since FDR to win
re-election. "Now that Howard Dean is clearly not going to be the nominee,
there is a very good chance that Hillary will be the vice presidential
candidate," Morris told Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes"
Wednesday night. "I would flat-out predict that whoever wins this nomination
makes the first phone call to Hillary to ask her to run," he said. Hillary
should take the offer from Kerry or whoever else sews up the nomination,
says Morris, as the best way to assure Sen. Clinton her own stint as
president. "If I were advising her right now, I would say take it, because
you're not going to lose by a lot," Morris urged. "And if a Democrat
wins, if Kerry wins, how is she going to stay fresh for eight years in the
Senate?" The one-time White House political guru noted also that if someone
other than Hillary takes the VP slot and wins, she'll have another rival to
contend with for her own White House bid."
Welcome to the world of J-Pandering. What have the candidates been doing for
our votes and just how important is the Jew factor?,
by Benyamin Cohen, Jewsweek, January 29,
2004
"The Iowa Caucuses are over and the New Hampshire primary votes are in. And
that can mean only one thing: election season is in full swing. Four years
ago we were just a few chads away from having the first mezuzah in the White
House. Now, a botched election, a war in Iraq, and several missteps later,
we have arrived at that precipice yet again. And this time, Joe Lieberman
isn't content with playing second fiddle, but is going for the Oval Office
... But before you start getting your tztitzit all tangled up, be
aware of this -- Lieberman is not the only yid with presidential
dreams. At last count, no less than half the
candidates are pulling their Jewish heritage out of their back pockets and
using them to bring in the votes. Consider this: Wesley Clark, whose
last name used to be Kahane, is Jewish. And John Kerry, the
Roman Catholic Massachusetts senator of Boston Brahmin heritage, recently
discovered that his own background was Jewish. In addition, Howard Dean's
wife, Dr. Judith Steinberg, is a member of the
tribe and is raising her kids to be Jewish. And then, of course is
Jumpin Joe Lieberman who, next to these other folks, looks like a
chassid in Brooklyn. For a while there, it looked like Al Sharpton was the
only one without a kosher connection. The candidates aren't stupid. (Well,
maybe they are, but they do have smart people telling them what to do.)
They know that a connection with Jewish identity can
make a huge difference on election day. With Lieberman on the
ticket, the Democrats gained 77 percent of the Jewish vote in 2000, their
highest mark in years. Though proportionally Jews are but a tiny segment of
the U.S. population -- less than two percent (but we're trying) --
we've always carried importance because of our
high-profile engagement in politics, academia, and media; that we come out
to vote in numbers vastly disproportionate to our size helps out a lot, too
... Retired General Wesley Clark, the most recent entry to the
crowded field, is a religious amalgam: Raised a Southern Baptist,
his family has deep Jewish roots -- his ancestors were
eminent rabbis. But he converted to Catholicism in Vietnam and now
attends a Presbyterian church. "I go to church. I've been a Christian my
whole life," he says. As well, infamous Kabbalist
and pop icon Madonna has thrown her support behind the religiously
confused Clar ... Another issue
is that the very religious identifier that could help a candidate with the
wider electorate might hurt him within his own denomination. That is because
so many faiths are currently roiled by divisive internal debates. Thus
a Jewish candidate, for example, might be forced to
answer sensitive questions about Jewish practice or relations with Israel.
And Catholic candidates would likely become embroiled in the internecine
fights over abortion rights and perhaps face sanctions from church hierarchy
who want them to vote according to official church teaching. Indeed, when
Lieberman ran in 2000, many Jewish journalists took the side of
explaining why Jews should go out of their way to not vote for the
yarmulke-wearing Connecticut senator. One reason, they
claimed, was that having a Jewish leader of the free world would only fan
the already growing flames of anti-Semitism across the globe. The
Republicans are making a comeback For decades American Jews have been
the most solidly Democratic bloc apart from African-Americans, and for
nearly as long, Republicans have been saying they are on the verge of ending
that monopoly. This year, experts say, the GOP may have its best shot at
making that dream a reality. A July 2003 Jewsweek
cover story entitled " Enter the Jewpublicans" discussed the burgeoning
trend among younger Jews to vote Republican. The defining issue, of course,
is the Bush administration's campaign against Islamist radicals. After 9/11,
many Jewish commentators said that the United States was now experiencing,
in terms of the daily threat of terrorism, what Israel has lived through for
years. That close identification between Israel and the U.S. remains and
many Jews across America have begun to fall in love with the Bush
administration. This alliance is not without risks for the president,
however. Experts say that if the war with Iraq continues to reveal cracks in
the Bush administration's facade, or if President Bush
tries to distance himself from the hard-line policies of Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon, Jews in America
could grow uneasy about the administration's commitment to defeating
Muslim-based terrorism. Moreover, the political alliance between Bush's
evangelical Christian base and Jewish groups is fraught with religious
perils. The same conservative Christians who strongly support Israel
often do so out of theological convictions about the Second Coming of Jesus
and the need to convert Jews to Christianity. These are flashpoints that can
explode at any time."
Rabbis Talk Jewish Life in Eastern Europe,
By VANESSA GERA, Newsday, February 2, 2004
"More than 100 Orthodox rabbis gathered Monday to seek ways to revive Jewish
life in eastern and central European communities still recovering from the
devastation of World War II and repression by the communists. The three-day
meeting, which began Sunday, comes a few months before the European Union
adds 10 new members, mostly ex-communist states where many Jews either
perished in the Holocaust or fled communist rule. The chief rabbi of Russia,
Berel Lazar, praised Russian President Vladimir Putin and other
leaders in the ex-Soviet sphere for promoting religious tolerance and
opposing anti-Semitism. "It's a miracle that the Jewish community is
reviving after 70, 80 years of repression when synagogues were being closed
and turned into warehouses, theaters, hospitals," Lazar said. "It's
like people are coming out of prison and seeing freedom for the first time."
Austrian President Thomas Klestil, who met with the rabbis Monday, called
the gathering "a signal that Jewish people from all over the world are
welcome in Austria" ...The new school will train rabbis, who then will be
sent to former communist countries to help rebuild Jewish life there,
Biederman said. It is financed by the Austrian
government and the Ronald S. Lauder Foundation, which has
worked to revive Jewish life in formerly communist Europe. "The eastern
communities are reviving after decades of communism, but they have to start
from scratch and start schools," Biederman said. "We have to provide
them with rabbis." Since the fall of communism, rabbis
trained in Israel or the United States have been sent to synagogues
and schools in former Soviet bloc countries ... At Monday's academy
inauguration ceremony, European Commission President Romano Prodi will
receive a humanitarian award for his efforts to
protect minorities in Europe, according to the Rabbinical Center of
Europe, the event organizer. The award comes as
Prodi and Jewish leaders work to patch up their differences following
several disputes. Prodi said Friday the European Commission will host a Feb.
19 conference on anti-Semitism in Europe, an event put on hold after some
Jewish groups accused the EU head office of anti-Semitism. The New
York-based World Jewish Congress condemned the European Commission for
censoring a study highlighting the involvement of Europe's Arab minorities
in anti-Semitic attacks in Europe in recent years. Previously,
an EU-commissioned survey put Israel at the top of a
list of nations seen by Europeans as threatening world peace. Several Jewish
groups condemned the report, with the World Jewish Congress calling it
"flawed and dangerously inflammatory."
Israeli Cabinet Minister Tzipi Livni Available to Discuss Situation in
Israel, Peace Process,
U.S. Newswire, Februyary 2, 2004
"News Advisory: WHO: Anti-Defamation League (ADL) WHAT:
ADL National Executive Committee Meeting
WHERE: The Breakers, Palm Beach, Florida WHEN: Thursday, Feb. 5 -
Friday, Feb. 6. Israeli Cabinet Member Tzipi
Livni, Minister for Immigration and Absorption,
will be available for interviews during ADL's National Executive Committee
Meeting in Palm Beach, Florida, February 5 - 6, 2004. Minister
Livni will be available to discuss the current situation in Israel, the
status of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, terrorism, the security
fence, and comment on breaking news in the Middle East."
U.S. Envoy: Violence Robs Ireland Future,
By SHAWN POGATCHNIK, Las Vegas Sun, February 2,
2004
"Continuing violence by the Irish Republican Army and other outlawed groups
"robs the people of Northern Ireland of their future,"
the new American envoy to this long-troubled British territory said
Monday, on the eve of another round of negotiations. Hopes were low that the
planned three months of negotiations starting Tuesday would resolve
arguments that have bedeviled the Good Friday peace accord, which proposed a
vast package of goals six years ago to end the 35-year conflict here.
The new envoy, Mitchell Weiss, met with
Britain's governor here, Paul Murphy, at the start of a three-day visit to
Belfast, Dublin and London. Weiss is a weapons
control expert who serves as director of policy planning at the State
Department. Weiss said his immediate goal was to "listen and
learn" about the province's competing factions and prospects for progress.
His predecessor as President Bush's envoy to Northern Ireland, Richard
Haass, resigned last year to become director of
the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations. Weiss said he
understood that many people were frustrated by the failure to sustain a
representative administration in this territory of 1.7 million people, about
55 percent of whom are British Protestants and 40 percent Irish Catholics."
Yukos-sponsored Khakamada accuses Putin,
The Russian Journal, January 14, 2004
"Yukos sponsored charity fund Open Russia will support Irina Khakamada, the
co-chairman of the Russian rightist political party the Union of Right
Forces (SPS), at the presidential elections. This was the statement made by
the rightist candidate at a press-conference today. Speaking about herself
in third person, she confirmed that Yukos sponsors her campaign: “Leonid
Nevzlin has made a public announcement that he supports Khakamada and is
ready to make a payment”. Nevzlin is one of the
majot Yukos shareholders, living in Israel. “Nevzlin offered
Open Russia members to support Khakamada”, the rightist said, not giving any
detail about the size of the expected financial aid. At the beginning of her
campaign, in the course of which she intends not to actually ‘challenge
Kremlin and Putin, but to address democratic electorate with encouragement’,
according to RIA Novosti, Khakamada nevertheless started with accusations
against Kremlin. She appealed to Russians in an open letter accusing
president Vladimir Putin of an intended and cold-blooded use of deadly gas
during the storm of the music theater during the Nord-Ost crisis in Oct.,
2002. Khakamada says she is running for the presidency to reveal the truth
about this crime and other crimes of state authorities. Khakamada told
journalists she was going to leave the Union of Right Forces in the event
the party did not support her candidacy at the presidential elections, as
she believes a candidate must not represent a party that does not support
him. Khakamada added that the possibility of nominating other SPS leaders,
Boris Nemtsov and Anatoly Chubais, as presidential candidates
would be considered at an SPS convention on Jan., 28."
Khakamada meets US officials in Washington,
Russian Journal, January 27, 2004
"Irina Khakamada, former Union of the Right Forces leader and presidential
candidate, made a trip to Washington on invitation of American congressman
Christopher Cox. There she met American congressmen, State Department
representatives and had a short unofficial meeting with US national security
advisor Condoleezza Rice. On Tuesday she spoke at Carnegie Fund before
experts on Russia and US government officials. During the trip Khakamada
tried to propagate her ideas regarding current situation
with democracy in Russia and to find support
from the US administration. “I tried to explain first of all that US-Russia
strategic cooperation is only possible"
Israel Asks State Dept. to Put Off Report,
By BARRY SCHWEID, Las Vegas Sun,
February 2, 2004
"Israel has asked the State Department to postpone its annual human rights
report for fear it could be used by the International Court of Justice
against the security barrier the Israelis are building.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity,
said the Israeli request was under consideration. Department
spokesman Richard Boucher, when asked about an article in the Israeli
newspaper Haaretz disclosing the request, said he was "not aware of
anything like that." Boucher also said the department intended to present
the report on time, at the end of February. Another U.S. official said
Israel worried contentions that its security barrier interfered with the
lives of Palestinians might be reflected in the human rights report and
influence the court in The Hague, The Netherlands.
Last week, the United States backed Israel in opposing the court's
consideration of the case. It was brought by the U.N. General
Assembly, with a request for an opinion, not a decision. Still, the State
Department told the court that cases can be brought only by states, not by
the General Assembly, and that intervention could hurt prospects for
negotiating a settlement of the issue. The European Union last Friday also
opposed the court's involvement. The court is expected to begin hearings on
the security barrier Feb. 23 with the backing of the Palestinians. It was
not known when the court might issue an opinion. Yasser Arafat, the
Palestinian leader, said nations that supported
Israel's position "don't respect international law ... but rather follow in
this mentality, the mentality of racist actions." President Bush and
other senior U.S. officials have invoked Israel's right of self-defense in
rebuffing Palestinian and Arab demands that the administration oppose the
project outright. However, Bush and the other officials have strongly
objected to parts of the construction plan on grounds that the combination
of trenches, fences, walls, razor wire and electronic sensors would
interfere with Palestinians' daily lives."
Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Frist to Address United Jewish
Communities Washington 14 Conference, U.S. Senators Join Roster of
Political, Media and Community Figures Speaking at March 21 – 23 Event,
January 30, 2004,
United Jewish Communties
"Senator Bill Frist (R-TN) and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) will
address attendees of the United Jewish Communities (UJC) Washington 14
Conference, taking place March 21-23 in the nation’s capital. Washington 14,
sponsored by the UJC Young Leadership Department, is expected to attract
nearly 2,000 young Jewish leaders from across the continent who will hear
from top American, Israeli and Jewish political, media and community
figures, meet other socially involved Jews, and discuss critical issues
affecting the Jewish community with their representatives on Capitol Hill.
The conference theme, We Can Make a Difference,
underscores the power of the next generation of Jewish leaders,
collectively and individually, to create positive social and political
change, and to practice tikkun olam, repair of
the world. “We are honored and proud that two of the country’s most
senior political leaders will address participants of Washington 14,” said
conference Co-Chair Jonathan A. Mayer of the Greater Miami Jewish Federation
and a member of the UJC National Young Leadership Cabinet. “As
majority leader, Senator Frist is the highest ranking member of the Senate,
and Senator Clinton's leadership and reputation speak for themselves. “Their
support over the years for issues of concern to the Jewish community is a
testament to the strength of our involvement in the political process, and
underscores the theme of Washington 14, We Can Make a Difference, both
politically and socially,” he continued ... Washington 14 sessions
will focus on such issues as anti-Semitism, terrorism,
Israel’s image in the media, domestic violence, and
social justice. Other guest speakers include:
political satirist Al Franken; Daniel Ayalon, Israeli
ambassador to the United States; Rabbi David Saperstein, director of
the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism; Congresswoman Shelley
Berkley (D-Nevada); Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Virginia); Steven
Emerson, award-winning author and commentator specializing in national
security, terrorism and Middle East affairs; Rabbi Shoshana Gelfand,
vice president and acting director of the Wexner Heritage Foundation;
Rabbi Irwin Kula, president of CLAL - The National Jewish Center for
Learning and Leadership; Dr. Deborah Lipstadt, Dorot Professor of
Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta;
Dennis Prager, radio talk show host on KABC, Los Angeles; and Dr.
Sabi Shabtai, internationally recognized authority on terrorism."
France to Help Finance Jewish Security Measures,
Reuters, February 3, 2004
"France has earmarked $18.61 million to help boost
security for Jewish schools, synagogues and offices threatened by recent
anti-Semitic attacks, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said on
Tuesday. "This is not just a problem for the Jews," he told the National
Assembly. "Every time a Jew is attacked because he's Jewish, it's a stain on
all of France." "We are determined to eradicate anti-Semitism in this
country," he said, adding that attacks on Jews and Jewish property had
fallen by 37 percent between 2002 and 2003. Also Tuesday, Justice Minister
Dominique Perben said police in the eastern town of Macon had opened an
inquiry after a Jewish singer was harassed with cries of "dirty Jew" and
"death to Jews" as she sang a song about Jerusalem last week. Perben
received the singer, known by her stage name Shirel, and told he was "very
shocked by these anti-Semitic insults." Sarkozy, who has been working with
France's Muslim leaders to better integrate their five-million strong
community, told legislators the surge in anti-Semitic attacks in recent
years was not a confrontation between ethnic groups. Officials have blamed
anti-Semitic attacks in recent years mostly on disaffected Muslim youths
taking revenge for Israeli policy in the Palestinian territories, sometimes
after seeing reports from the region on Arab satellite television."
Ripping of the taxpayer, student-style,
by Ben Shapiro, Town Hall, Send February
4, 2004
"While most Californians -- like me -- are looking forward to government
downsizing, some are afraid of losing benefits. Unsurprisingly, those crying
the loudest for money from the pockets of others are my fellow college
students, the "gimme" generation. A group led by the University of
California Student Association and four UC students is suing Gov.
Schwarzenegger for repealing the car tax and cutting outreach and labor
programs at the University of California. Many of these outreach programs
have admirable goals. None of them deserves state money. Private funding to
help "underrepresented" groups reach the UC system is proper and worthwhile.
But in a state where the top 4 percent of each high school class
automatically are eligible to enter the UC system, race-based outreach
should not be subsidized by public dollars. Outreach at the University of
California is designed to bring "diversity" into the college classroom.
After the abolition of affirmative action programs in California, outreach
became big business. Outreach caters to black and Latino communities to the
tune of $24 million per year ... As a UC student, I have benefited immensely
from state education, but if the taxpayers are unwilling to spend money on
my schooling, I must take personal responsibility for my own tuition. When
Californians elected the Terminator, they voted for government cuts. Cuts
hurt. But they hurt far less than tax increases, as Gov. Davis discovered."
Benjamin
Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed
into a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer. He entered UCLA at
the age of 16 and is currently a senior majoring in political science. Never
afraid to antagonize his political opposition, he was the only
counter-protester at an Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people
on UCLA's campus, and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and
faculty. He was hired in the summer of 2001 by the
advertising team that had run George W. Bush's presidential campaign,
writing copy for its planned ad campaign in support of Israel. As a
staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus, Shapiro faces
the political liberals head-on. From exposing the leftist tilt of the
professoriate on college campuses to addressing the conflict in the Middle
East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always draws a hailstorm of
response. His columns are printed nationwide in major newspapers and
websites, including Townhall.com, the Orlando Sentinel, and the Conservative
Chronicle. He is a regular guest on numerous radio shows around the United
States and Canada."
[Bush just announced his planned American budget, including a swarm of
cuts in education and social programs, YET the U.S. will be kissing the
Jewish Lobby's Omnipresent Butt and "compensating" the racist Israeli
"settler" fanatics in Gaza. Why? Jews OWN American foreign policy. It is
their personal plaything.]
The cost of a possible Gaza evacuation,
By Ellis Shuman, Israel Insider,
February 3, 2004
"A Finance Ministry team has recently begun preparing a formula for
compensating Jewish families that would leave their homes and businesses in
17 Gaza Strip settlements, Maariv reported today. The estimated
compensation that would be awarded to each of some 1,500 families would be
about $500,000. The United States will be asked to
help cover the cost. The Finance Ministry team, led by
Director-General Yossi Bachar, will present its compensation formula
to National Security Council chairman Giora Eiland, who has been asked by
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to prepare implementation of the
disengagement plan, which would include the "relocation" of Gaza settlements
to new locations in Israel. Sharon said the removal of the Gaza
settlements should be made with the settlers' consent
and the support of the American government. "We are talking of a
population of 7,500 people. It's not a simple matter. We are talking of
thousands of square kilometers of hothouses, factories and packing plants.
There are people who are third generation there," he said. Compensation to
the relocated settlers will be based on the same formula used to compensate
settlers evacuated in the early 1980s from the Sinai following the signing
of Israel's peace treaty with Egypt ... According to media reports, Sharon
plans to present U.S. President George W. Bush a detailed list and timetable
for the Gaza evacuation, which may begin as early as this summer.
Sharon is expected to ask for special aid from the
United States to help implement the plan, the reports said. Following the
signing of Israel's peace agreement with Egypt, the United States paid for a
large proportion of the cost of dismantling Jewish communities in the Sinai:
both compensation payments to the Jews who lost their homes and the cost of
relocating them in Israel, Globes reported.
That American aid may serve as a precedent if Sharon's plan to
evacuate the 17 Gaza Strip settlements is implemented."
'Irish-American' Kerry's Jewish roots revealed,
BY LYNN SWEET, Chicago Sun-Times, February 9,
2004
"Presidential candidates find their lives--and their lineage--are put under
a microscope. In the case of Sen. John Forbes Kerry, new scrutiny led
to the discovery that the grandfather of the Massachusetts Democrat was
Jewish, born Fritz Kohn in a small town that was once part of the
Austrian empire and now is in the Czech Republic. The
revelation is interesting because Kerry is most often taken as a Boston
Brahmin, mainly because his mother comes from the upper-crust Forbes and
Winthrop families, who are well-known in New England. Kerry is also a
practicing Catholic. His name and his home state, which contains the
nation's biggest Irish-American population, have led people to conclude that
he is something he is not. "People assume," said Kerry spokesman David Wade.
"Your name is Kerry, you are from Massachusetts, the land of the Kennedys."
It remains to be seen whether any issue will develop over whether Kerry
tried hard enough to wave people away from the assumption that he was
Irish-American. Several friends of Kerry who were interviewed
said they assumed him to be Irish-American. Kerry learned about his
grandfather's heritage last month from Boston Globe reporter
Michael Kranish, whose research led to Kerry discovering the
details of his grandfather's 1921 suicide in a Boston hotel washroom. The
son of a diplomat, "John has talked a lot about how he grew up in different
places, how he did not have a sense of connectiveness," said Wade. Since the
story was published last Sunday, Kerry found it "great to have a
sense of family history he did not have before." Kerry
told the Globe he had found out about 15 years ago that his paternal
grandmother, Ida Lowe, was born Jewish.
But he said he knew nothing about his grandfather's
roots. Wade said Kerry said he remembers his grandmother as a
"zealous Catholic." The Globe pieced together Kerry's genealogy
through Ellis Island immigration records, other documents in Chicago and
records from the former Austrian Empire. The paper hired Felix Gundacker,
director of the Institute for Historical Family Research in Vienna, to
examine and translate the German-language records. Kerry's
grandfather, who emigrated to the United States in 1905, was born in an
Austrian town once known as Bennisch, which today is called Horni Benesov in
the Czech Republic. Gundacker found birth records noting the 1873
birth of a Fritz Kohn and another record noting Kohn changed
his name to Frederick Kerry on March 17, 1902. The Globe
quoted Gundacker as "1,000 percent certain" that Kerry/Kohn was born
to a Jewish family because the church records were on a page listing Jewish
families. Ironically, Kerry's younger brother,
Cameron, a Boston lawyer, converted to Judaism in 1983, when he married a
Jewish woman. Kerry grew up in the dark over the circumstances
of his grandfather's suicide.""
Dana
Rohrabacher’s Troubling Friends,
By Kenneth R. Timmerman, FrontPageMagazine.com,
January 26, 2004
"Top Jewish Republicans who have supported Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
(R-CA) for decades said in interviews that they have “serious concerns” with
the California Republican’s ties to radical Muslim groups and their foreign
backers, and his outspoken efforts to champion their cause in Congress.
“Before 9-11, Dana’s views seemed idiosyncratic,” said Arnold Steinberg,
a political consultant whose ties to Rohrabacher go
back to Youth for Goldwater in 1964. “We rationalized that he wasn’t
fully informed or had a blind spot” to the Islamists, who were contributing
to his re-election campaigns, hanging around his office, and sponsoring
trips by Rohrabacher and his staff to the Arab Middle East. Rohrabacher
seemingly paid back those contributors by an
“even-handed” approach toward the Israeli-Arab conflict, a key demand
of influential Muslim backers. “Even-handed” is a
code-word used by radical Muslim groups, such as the American Muslim
Council (AMC) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), to
signify support for the Palestinian cause, including Hamas, and angry
condemnation of Israel as a terrorist state. After 9-11, Rohrabacher’s views
and public actions took on a more sinister appearance, as radical Muslim
groups began to count on him increasingly as support for their positions
dwindled in Congress. In a heated May 2, 2002 exchange with conservative
talk show host Alan Keyes, for instance, Rohrabacher insisted that “[Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon and [Palestinian Authority President
Yasser] Arafat are cut out of the same cloth” and claimed that “there’s been
acts of terrorism committed against the Palestinian people as well,”
statements that made Keyes audibly gasp. ...
Steinberg is just one of a closely-knit group of Rohrbacher friends and
supporters who have been trying over the past eighteen months to get the
California libertarian to open himself up to other viewpoints. For years,
these supporters - many of whom asked not to be cited by name for this
article - have urged Rohrabacher to travel to Israel.
When he complained that no one would sponsor the trip, they offered to pay
his travel expenses, but again he refused. “He was a journalist for
years, he was in the White House, he was a member of congress since 1988,”
one donor said. “Somehow, he never went to Israel, despite trips all over
the world, and especially to Arab countries.” Rohrabacher finally traveled
to Israel and the Palestinian territories as part of a three-day
Congressional delegation in 2003. “Dana has a very antagonist attitude
toward Ariel Sharon,” says long-time supporter Howard Klein, a
member of the influential Lincoln Club of Orange county Republicans. “But it
goes much deeper than that. He doesn’t understand the strategic or moral
imperatives in the U.S. alliance with Israel and the forces that want to
drive Israel to extinction.” Rohrabacher refused to answer questions for
this article, on the grounds that the publisher of Frontpagemag.com,
David Horowitz, has been “actively involved in trying to recruit someone
to run against him in the Republican primary,” a spokesman said. But an aid
who accompanied him on the trip to Israel insisted that Rohrabacher “spoke
the same language” to Israeli and Palestinian leaders, infuriating them
both."
Background / Will Sharon help Bush win re-election?,
By Bradley Burston, Haaretz (Israel),
Februay 10, 2004
"When Ariel Sharon was elected to the premiership a few days after
George W. Bush took his own oath of office in early 2001, Sharon
began his victory speech by telling cheering supporters of a telephone call
he had just received, from the White House. "No one believed then," the
prime minister-elect quoted Bush as having told him, in a reference to a
visit in which Sharon had taken then-governor Bush on a tour of the
West Bank, "that I would be president and you would be prime minister. But
as things turned out, despite the fact that no one believed us, I have been
elected president, and you have been elected prime minister." They are two
men who are accustomed to being underestimated, vilified as murderers,
scorned as possessors of ill intent. They are two men who share a
commonality of neo-conservative outlook and action. And, although diplomatic
etiquette forbids them from saying so outright, they
are two men who, it may be assumed, would very much like to see the other
stay in office for the foreseeable future. No
foreign leader has visited the Bush
White House more often than Sharon, to
whom Bush has referred in talks with visitors as "my friend Arik."
For Sharon, the 2004 presidential election may be crucial to the fate
of the policies he foresees. As a consequence, the U.S. race could be a key
factor in determining outcome of a possible re-election campaign of
Sharon's own. There is little doubt that Bush has
been as congenial a U.S. president as Sharon
could have desired, allowing the prime minister historic levels of freedom
of action in both the military and diplomatic spheres. By contrast -
and with Joseph Lieberman now out of the race to the White House -
the positions of nearly all Democratic candidates are seen as likely to hew
to Oslo-influenced lines inspired by party icon Bill Clinton. In spirit if
not in detail or pace, the Democratic platform may well have its roots in
Clinton's ill-fated rush to forge a workable Israeli-Palestinian peace
before he turned over the keys to the Oval Office to Bush. Should they begin
where Clinton left off, Democrats are unlikely to abide for even a moment
such Sharon-bred notions as the creation of Palestinian cantons in the West
Bank. In many areas of the United States, Arab American activists and donors
also enjoy much better access to Democratic movers and shakers than to
Republicans. If, in fact, Sharon would prefer to see George Bush
re-elected, what can he do to help? The question is not a simple one, in
view of the complexity of U.S. Jewry's relationship to Israel in general,
and to Sharon in particular. American Jews have
been among the strongest champions of Sharon's
policies, and among the most acrid of his critics ... . The best way
for Sharon to aid the Bush re-election bandwagon may be to stay out
of its way. "On the one hand, Sharon must avoid situations that would
force Bush into a head-on confrontation with Israel," says Haaretz
commentator Akiva Eldar. "On the other, he must avoid any move that
would embarass Bush, any move that could make Bush look like a jerk with
regard to the road map and the 'Bush vision' - to avoid any move that could
add the road map to the list of fiascos in the Middle East. "From now on,
and until the election, what Sharon needs to do to help Bush is to
put the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the back burner from the president's
standpoint. To keep it out of the headlines.
This involves, first of all, refraining from making any dramatic moves such
as expelling or killing Yasser Arafat." ... Visiting Israel this week,
insider's insider Malcolm Hoenlein of the Conference of Presidents of
Major Jewish Organizations said Bush might fare even better when Jews go to
the polls. Jewish support for Bush "could go up higher, maybe even as high
as 40 percent, which would be a significant change," said Hoenlein,
who has been credited in the past with leading the organized Jewish
community's perceived tilt to the right ... Bearing in mind that the
Democratic majority among Jews remains strong, Bush's best strategy may be
in working to keep Jewish donors from giving to the Democratic contender -
at present, Kerry - Eldar believes. This
involves casting doubt on Kerry's support for Israel, not an easy task in
view of the senator's past pro-Israel record. "What
I believe that what Bush will do is to try to convince the Jewish
constituency that he is more pro-Israel than Kerry."
The City Politic. Cash and Kerry. The city’s wealthy Kerry backers have a
message for undecided donors: Fund the front-runner—now—or lose to Bush
later,
By Greg Sargent, New York magazine, February
16, 2004
"The cocktail party at financier Blair Effron’s Park Avenue duplex on
February 3 had a simple purpose: to persuade some of the city’s biggest
political fund-raisers to throw their considerable resources behind the one
man their hosts believe can beat George W. Bush—John Kerry. Effron
had invited a special guest, former Nebraska governor turned New School
president Bob Kerrey, to convince this deep-pockets crowd that the
front-runner was indeed electable. And there Kerrey stood, in front of a big
screen bearing an image of the nation’s electoral map, pressing his case. As
fund-raising targets like money manager Gregg Hymowitz and
real-estate magnate John Tishman looked on, Kerrey outlined a
detailed, state-by-state scenario in which the junior Massachusetts senator
could take the White House. The room buzzed with excited political chatter
... Ever since Iowa, Kerry’s New York finance team, led by Jamie Whitehead,
has done a remarkable job of diverting money and supporters his way. Just
last week, for instance, Harvey Weinstein decided to back Kerry after
a long period of fence-sitting. Weinstein was considered a coup,
since he can organize celebrity-studded events that
can move hefty sums of Hollywood cash into political coffers. And
Kerry has won other big New York backers recently, like money manager
Richard Medley and former ambassador Carl Spielvogel and his wife, author
Barbaralee Diamonstein."
Jews Choose. Will George W.
Bush get their vote come November?,
By Carl Schrag, Slate, February10, 2004
"Matthew Brooks, the executive director of the Republican Jewish
Coalition, has been riding high lately. Who can blame him? After toiling
away as the leading spokesman of Jewish Republicans for more than a dozen
years, he's finally starting to see signs that the tiny interest group might
be growing. When the American Jewish Committee released a poll last month
showing that as many as 31 percent of American Jews
would vote for President Bush if presidential elections were held today,
Brooks could hardly contain his glee. In fact, he didn't seem to try
at all. "It [is] now undeniable that there is a major shift taking place
among Jewish voters," Brooks trumpeted in a press release commenting
on the poll ... Many would ask why the Jewish vote is so important—Jews
comprise less than 2 percent of the country's population. But their
significance comes from three key factors: First of all, Jews tend to vote
in larger numbers than other ethnic groups. Secondly, their concentration in
urban areas in high-population states means their votes help determine the
allocation of large numbers of Electoral College votes. And finally, they
don't limit their political activism to Election Day; Jews have been among
the most generous supporters of political campaigns, especially those of
Democratic candidates. While the high Jewish turnout is likely to continue,
the largest concentrations of Jewish voters may not help the president, even
if they do swing to his side. New York and California, home to the country's
two largest concentrations of Jews, account for 86 of the 270 electoral
votes needed to win, but even if Jews turn out for Bush, however, it's
unlikely their votes will be enough to tip the balance in these two states.
In swing states such as Florida, however, a change of Jewish heart could
mean the difference for the Bush campaign."
Top Cops Return From JINSA-Sponsored Anti-Terror Study In Israel,
JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security
Affairs), February 9, 2004
"Fourteen of the most senior police chiefs, sheriffs
and state police commanders returned from Israel last week after five
days of intensively studying counter terrorism techniques. These law
enforcement executives traveled to Israel on January 24 and returned January
30, 2004. They went as participants in JINSA’s Law
Enforcement Exchange Program (LEEP). Modeled after the JINSA’s
extremely successful Flag & General Officers Trip, the
LEEP program is designed to establish cooperation between American and
Israeli law enforcement personnel and to give the American law
enforcement community access to the hard “lessons learned” by the Israelis
in the interdiction of and response to all forms of terrorism. The Israeli
National Police hosted the Americans with participation by the Israel
Defense Forces (IDF) and the Israel Security Agency. The delegation studied
methods and observed techniques used by Israeli police forces in preventing
and reacting to suicide bombers, and joined Israeli police on a nighttime
patrol of Tel Aviv. The agenda also focused on the critical role of
intelligence gathering and interagency information
sharing ... The group also took time to look at the Security Fence as
a defensive measure to lessen the possibility of terrorist infiltration. The
saw where the fence has already been constructed as well as planned future
sights. The consensus of the group was that in light of prior Israeli
casualties the fence has saved lives. Steven Pomerantz, Executive
Director of the Center For Criminal Justice Technology at Mitretek Systems,
in Virginia, led in the planning and execution of the
trip on the American side. In summing up the goals of the LEEP
project, Pomerantz, a former Assistant Director
of the FBI and a member of JINSA’s Board of Advisors, noted, “Nothing
can replicate American officials seeing these types of problems firsthand
and the systems that are put in place to deal with them.” This is the second
time JINSA has organized a delegation of U.S. law enforcement officials to
learn from their Israeli counterparts. Called the Law Enforcement Exchange
Program (LEEP), JINSA hopes to undertake the trip annually, each time with a
new group of officers. Participants were invited through a process that
considered geographic region, their involvement in national professional
policing organizations and their professional responsibilities in the fight
against terrorism. For example, in addition to serving as chief of his
department, Chief Joseph Polisar is the current president of the
International Chiefs of Police (IACP), the largest international police
organization in the world. All other major American law enforcement
organizations were represented on the trip including the Major Cities Chiefs
Association, Major Counties Sheriffs Association and the Police Executive
Research Forum. Participants in the program included: Chief Joseph Carter
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Col. Richard Fuentes New Jersey
State Police, Sheriff Patrick Gallivan Erie County, N.Y. [encompassing
Buffalo, NY], William Gore Special Adviser and Chief of Investigations for
the San Diego County, Calif. District Attorney, Commander Cathy Lanier
Commanding officer of the Special Operations Division of the Metropolitan
Police Department, Washington, D.C., Sheriff Patrick McGowan Hennepin
County, Minn. [encompassing Minneapolis], Col. Jeffrey Miller Pennsylvania
State Police, Bureau Chief John Miller Los Angeles Police Department's
Critical Incident Management Bureau, Sheriff Jim Pendergraph Mecklenburg
County, N. Car. [encompassing Charlotte], Chief Joseph Polisar Garden Grove,
Calif. Police Department, First Deputy Superintendent Dana Starks Chicago
Police Department, Deputy Chief Larry Thompson Chief of Uniformed Services,
United States Capitol Police, and Chief Maryanne Viverette Gaithersburg, Md.
Police Department. Mark Broxmeyer, JINSA’s Chairman traveled with the
group."
Raiding the U.S. Treasury,
By Ronald Forthofer, Palestine Chronicle,
February 16, 2003
"Like a thief in the night, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is
planning a raid on the U.S. Treasury to the tune of $12 to $14 billion. This
amount is in addition to about $3 to $5 billion Israel already receives each
year from U.S. taxpayers. Shamefully, the Bush administration agreed to this
raid, but asked Sharon not to campaign openly for these funds. Bush
wants to keep the U.S. taxpayer in the dark about this incredibly huge
transfer of our tax dollars to Israel. Bush is probably afraid that we
taxpayers would question this gift in a time when he claims we can't afford
to fund many programs here at home. For example, $12 billion could provide
health care for millions of our children who currently have to go to
emergency rooms for treatment. Or it could fund affordable housing programs
for hundreds of thousands of Americans. Some might prefer to use it to put
money into the cleanup of Super Fund sites. Others might use it to
jump-start a renewable energy program to decrease our reliance on foreign
oil. It is clear that there are many pressing needs here at home. There are
also tremendous needs internationally where this money could make a huge
difference in reducing poverty and help restore our image as a caring
nation. Some claim that Israel is our ally and therefore deserving of this
huge subsidy. This is the same country that spies on the U.S. and which
provided the Soviet Union with information obtained from Jonathan Pollard,
the American who spied for Israel. Casper Weinberger, then U.S. Secretary of
Defense, said about Pollard's treason that: "It is difficult for me ... to
conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by the
defendant in the view of the breadth, the critical importance to the U.S.,
and the high sensitivity of the information he sold to Israel." Israel has
also provided China with weapons based on advanced U.S. technology. In
addition, Israel is the nation that deliberately attacked the USS Liberty in
open waters, killing 34 U.S. sailors and wounding another 171. With friends
like Israel, who needs enemies? If this aid were granted, how would Israel
use it? Four billion dollars are for additional military aid and the rest is
loan guarantees. Sharon, a war criminal to many throughout the world,
claims Israel needs more military aid because of the second Palestinian
Intifada. Talk about chutzpah! |